Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Article information
Abstract
Purpose
To analyze changes in choroidal thickness in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) before and after surgical intervention and to identify factors that influence changes in choroidal thickness.
Methods
A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for recurrent RRD from November 2019 to March 2023. Choroidal thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and at 2 and 6 months postoperatively. The study analyzed the impact of various factors on choroidal thickness changes.
Results
The study included 33 patients, demonstrating a significant decrease in choroidal thickness in the surgical eye compared to the fellow eye over a 6-month period. In the univariate analysis, changes in choroidal thickness were significantly correlated with changes in central retinal thickness (p = 0.048) from baseline to 2 months and with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade from 2 to 6 months (p = 0.009) and from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.020). In the multivariate analysis, an association was found between changes in choroidal thickness from 2 to 6 months and PVR grade (p = 0.030)
Conclusions
The findings indicate that surgical reattachment in eyes with recurrent RRD leads to a significant reduction in choroidal thickness. The extent of this reduction is influenced by the severity of PVR, highlighting the importance of considering PVR severity when evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with recurrent RRD.
The choroid is responsible for maintaining the function of the retina by supplying oxygen and nutrients to the retinal epithelial layer. Previous studies have reported decreased blood flow to the macula after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery, which has been associated with poor visual acuity after RRD surgery [1]. Given that subfoveal choroidal thickness can be used as a tool to assess ocular blood flow function in the macula, measuring changes in choroidal thickness after surgery is important [2].
Previous studies of choroidal thickness after RRD surgery have reported mixed results, with some reporting increased subfoveal choroidal thickness in rhegmatogenous eyes compared to normal eyes and that choroidal thickness decreases again after retinal adhesion to become nonsignificantly different from normal eyes [3,4], and others reporting decreased choroidal thickness after surgery [5].
To the best of our knowledge, previous studies investigating choroidal thickness changes have defined the control as the choroidal thickness of the contralateral eye. This approach stems from the practical limitation of being unable to measure choroidal thickness before RRD occurs in patients with this condition. However, we have previously reported interocular differences in choroidal thickness in exotropia patients [6]. Considering the characteristic prevalence of myopia in RRD, comparing choroidal thickness with that of the contralateral eye could introduce errors.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate changes in choroidal thickness after surgery in patients with recurrent RRD by measuring the choroidal thickness before the occurrence of recurrent RRD and aimed to identify factors influencing these changes in choroidal thickness.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
This retrospective observational study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital (No. HPIRB 2023-07-011-001). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki
Study design
We included patients diagnosed and treated for recurrent RRD between November 2019 and March 2023. Recurrent RRD was defined as stable retinal attachment just after surgery and detached again thereafter. Patients with high myopia (axial length ≥28 mm or spherical equivalent ≤–6), macular hole RD, traumatic RD, age-related macular degeneration, pachychoroidal neovascularization, retinal vascular occlusion, or diabetic retinopathy were excluded as these conditions could affect choroidal thickness. Recurrence within 2 weeks and aged <18 years were also excluded.
Baseline choroidal thickness was defined as the choroidal thickness with macular adhesions immediately prior to the time of recurrence detection and collected at 2 and 6 months after reoperation. Choroidal thickness was defined as the distance from the lower part of the retinal pigment epithelial layer to the choroid-sclera interface on the horizontal section of the optical coherence tomography (OCT), and thickness measurement was performed using the method proposed by Manjunath et al. [7] and Ban et al. [8] (Fig. 1). In brief, measurement was done using built-in OCT software at 500-μm intervals up to 2,500 μm temporal and nasal to the fovea and mean value was used as choroidal thickness. Spectral-domain OCT with enhanced depth imaging (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) was utilized. Choroidal thickness was measured regardless of tamponade status. Manual measurements made by two researchers using manual calipers were compared, and the average of the two measurements was used. If t he measurements of the two investigators differed by more than 10%, a third investigator arbitrated and the mean of the values differing by less than 10% was used. The choroidal thickness of the contralateral eye was also measured at the same time point and used as a control for analysis. Interobserver reliability was evaluated for choroidal thickness measurement.
In addition to choroidal thickness, factors such as age, sex, slit-lamp examination results, spherical equivalent, axial length, surgical methods used during the initial and subsequent surgeries, time until recurrence of RRD after the first surgery, extent of RD (superior/inferior), presence of macular detachment, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) were evaluated. Best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and central retinal thickness were also examined prior to recurrence, and 2 and 6 months after reoperation. The average retinal thickness within the central 1,000-μm area from the OCT macular thickness map was used to determine the central retinal thickness (CRT).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp). Changes in choroidal thickness over time for both the subject and control groups were investigated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post hoc analysis was performed to examine the significance of differences between time points (baseline vs. 2 months, 2 months vs. 6 months, baseline vs. 6 months) using paired-samples t-test. If Mauchly test of sphericity was violated in the repeated measures ANOVA, degrees of freedom were adjusted using the Greenhouse-Geisser and Huynh-Feldt methods. Pearson correlation analysis and Spearman rank correlation coefficient analysis was conducted to identify factors contributing to changes in choroidal thickness as part of univariate analysis, and multiple regression with dummy value was used for multivariate analysis. The statistical significance of each factor was set at p < 0.05, but Bonferroni correction was applied in post hoc analysis to control for type I errors. We analyzed interobserver reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results
A total of 33 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 54.5 ± 17.3 years, with 20 men (60.6%) and 13 women (39.4%). At the time of recurrence, the state of the macula was attached in 24 eyes (72.7%) and detached in 9 eyes (27.3%). Extent of RRD showed superior detachment in 9 eyes (27.3%), inferior detachment in 22 eyes (66.7%), and both superior and inferior involvement in 2 eyes (6.1%). At the time of recurrence, 29 eyes were diagnosed with PVR (87.9%), with 6 eyes (18.2%) showing PVR grade A, 12 eyes (36.4%) showing PVR grade B, and 11 eyes (33.3%) showing PVR grade C. The median axial length was 25.5 mm (range, 22.6–27.7 mm). The mean time to recurrence after the primary surgery was 126.8 days (median, 60 days; range, 30–1,139 days) (Table 1).
At the primary surgery, 8 eyes (24.2%) underwent explant buckling, 22 eyes (66.7%) had pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) alone, and 3 eyes (9.1%) had both explant buckling and PPV. During reoperation, 26 eyes (78.8%) received PPV alone, and 7 eyes (21.2%) had both encircling and PPV. The surgical methods and types of tamponades used during reoperation are listed in Table 2.
The baseline choroidal thickness for the recurrent and fellow eyes was 201.32 ± 80.54 and 200.12 ± 78.41 μm, respectively. At postoperative 2 months, the measurements were 195.18 ± 72.15 μm for the recurrent eye and 198.93 ± 78.85 μm for the fellow eye. At postoperative 6 months, measurements were 186.32 ± 72.96 μm for the recurrent eye and 197.46 ± 77.63 μm for the fellow eye (Fig. 2). When comparing the choroidal thickness of the recurrent and fellow eyes, a significant decrease in choroidal thickness over time was observed in the recurrent eye, but not in the fellow eye (repeated measures ANOVA; recurrent eye: Greenhouse-Geisser, p = 0.009 and Huynh-Feldt, p = 0.009; fellow eye: Greenhouse-Geisser, p = 0.214 and Huynh-Feldt p = 0.213). In the post hoc analysis, there was no significant difference from baseline to 2 months. However, significant reductions in choroidal thickness were observed in the recurrent eye from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.089) and from 2 to 6 months (p = 0.010; p = 0.012, after applying Bonferroni correction, with a significance level set at p < 0.0167).
The baseline CRT for the recurrent and fellow eyes was 313.44 ± 115.08 and 308.21 ± 95.76 μm, respectively. At postoperative 2 months, the measurements were 291.72 ± 80.37 μm for the recurrent eye and 310.58 ± 96.23 μm for the fellow eye. At postoperative 6 months, the measurements were 311.34 ± 97.16 μm for the recurrent eye and 311.51 ± 94.45 μm for the fellow eye.
In the univariate analysis, change in choroidal thickness showed correlation with change in CRT from baseline to 2 months (r = 0.347, p = 0.048). However, no significant correlation was observed from 2 to 6 months (p = 0.497) and from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.260). Worse grading of PVR showed a greater decrease of choroidal thickness from 2 to 6 months and from baseline to 6 months, with correlation coefficients of −0.448 (p = 0.009) and −0.404 (p = 0.020), respectively. No significant correlation was found from baseline to 2 months (p = 0.229) (Table 3). In the multivariate analysis, an association was identified between the changes in choroidal thickness from 2 to 6 months and the grade of PVR (p = 0.030) (Table 4).
Our study demonstrated interobserver reliability for choroidal thickness measurements, with a single measures ICC of 0.984 (95% confidence interval, 0.367–0.996; p < 0.001) and an average measures ICC of 0.992 (95% confidence interval, 0.537–0.998; p < 0.001)
Discussion
The results of this study showed that the choroidal thickness in eyes with recurrent RRD was statistically significantly reduced compared to the fellow eye 6 months after surgical treatment. The change in choroidal thickness varied over time but was correlated with the grade of PVR and the change in central retinal thickness.
Several studies have reported on the changes in choroidal thickness after primary RRD surgery. Some studies have shown a significant increase in subfoveal choroidal thickness immediately after surgery, and from postoperative 1 month, the thickness returned to the level of a normal eye [4,9]. A report from Korea observed a significant decrease in choroidal thickness in the second month after surgery, and a significant decrease in choroidal thickness was also observed in the group that had more than 30 days elapse from symptom onset to the day of surgery [8]. This finding aligns with the results of our study. However, a limitation of all previous studies is that they set the control group as choroidal thickness in the fellow eye.
As the results of this study, changes in choroidal thickness vary over time. In this study, patients who showed recurrence within 2 weeks were excluded, as it was difficult to distinguish recurrence from primary failure. As a result, among the patients enrolled in the study, the shortest duration between the first and second surgeries was 30 days, with a median of 60 days. Therefore, it was assumed that for these patients, the choroidal thickness had stabilized after the initial adhesion between the neurosensory retina and the choroid considering normalization after 1 month [4], and therefore the authors speculated that baseline choroidal thickness was measured after this stabilization period and can be used as baseline value.
In this study, the change in CRT and the change in choroidal thickness showed a correlation, with a positive correlation observed between baseline and 2 months. After that period, no correlation could be found. Among the 33 eyes studied, cystoid macular edema was present in 6 eyes at the 2-month and 17 at the 6-month mark, which may have made it difficult to find a significant relationship between CRT and choroidal thickness after the secondary surgery.
In the multivariate analysis, change of choroidal thickness significantly associated with the grade of PVR. During RRD, many metabolic processes are disrupted, which may affect choroid circulation to change in choroidal thickness. PVR also occurs in RD especially in chronic cases. We could assume that chronicity might account for association of PVR and choroidal thickness, although there was no correlation between time to recurrence and change in choroidal thickness. Further larger study should be done.
After attachment, the thickness of the choroid decreased, and one possible mechanism for this could be the effect of silicone oil tamponade. According to previous reports, there are several studies suggesting that the use of silicone oil leads to a decrease in choroidal thickness thereafter [5,10,11]. The direct pathophysiological mechanism behind the decrease in central choroidal thickness due to silicone oil has not yet been clarified. However, there are study results suggesting that central retinal degeneration occurs due to the failure of Müller cells to absorb potassium due to silicone oil toxicity. This, in turn, could have a negative impact on the central choroidal blood flow, leading to a decrease in central choroidal thickness [12,13]. Additionally, there are reports suggesting that the infiltration of silicone oil into the retina can cause neural damage to ganglion and bipolar cell synapses, leading to a decrease in macular function [14]. There are reports suggesting that mechanical stress from silicone oil tamponade and inflammation caused by the subretinal migration of silicone oil can also be contributing factors [15–17]. As other possible mechanisms, there are reports that performing laser photocoagulation not only destroys the structure of the retina but also reduces the thickness of the choroid [18,19]. In the current study, among the tamponades used for retinal reattachment surgeries, silicone oil was used in 81.8% of cases. Based on previous research, the observed decrease in choroidal thickness in this study could potentially be attributed to the use of silicone oil [5,10,11]. However, no significant differences were found between the groups according to the type of tamponade used in this study.
We attempted to analyze the duration of re-detachment, defining it as the period from symptom onset to the date of reoperation, or from the date of detection to the date of reoperation. However, we were unable to derive meaningful results. In all cases, reoperation was performed within 2 weeks of detection, with many cases proceeding as emergency operations on the day of detection.
The limitations of this study include the small number of subjects, which may limit statistical interpretation, and the lack of analysis on the area of PVR and laser treatment extent, preventing the analysis of choroidal thickness changes according to PVR area and laser treatment area. The inability to clarify the correlation between choroidal thickness and visual function is thought to be due to the retrospective nature and the small number of subjects. Chronicity should be evaluated as our group reported it is related with change in choroidal thickness in primary RRD [8]. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, we could not be able to get precise duration of re-detachment. Additionally, we could not be able to address how PVR influences choroidal thickness through its pathophysiology. Despite these limitations, this study is significant as it is a report to measure the changes in choroidal thickness in the same eye, rather than the contralateral eye, before and after surgery in patients with RRD.
In conclusion, in patients with recurrent RRD, the thickness of the choroid significantly decreased after reattachment of the retina, and the greater the severity of PVR, the more the choroidal thickness decreased.
Acknowledgements
None.
Notes
Conflicts of Interest:
None.
Funding:
None.