Effects of Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty on Perceived Attractiveness, Success, and Health

Article information

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024;38(6):437-440
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 August 16
doi : https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2024.0092
1Department of Ophthalmology, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye
2Department of Ophthalmology, Privite Clinic, Istanbul, Turkiye
3Department of Ophthalmology, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye
Corresponding Author: Elif Ertan, MD. Department of Ophthalmology, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Olimpiyat Blv Rd, Istanbul, 34480, Turkiye. Tel: 90-2129096000, Fax: 90-2129096060, Email: elif-ertan@hotmail.com
This study was presented as an oral presentation at the 16th National Congress of the Facial Plastic Surgery Association in Istanbul, Turkiye, on December 9–11, 2022.
Received 2024 July 25; Revised 2024 August 1; Accepted 2024 August 14.

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the impact of upper eyelid blepharoplasty on perceived age, attractiveness, success, and overall health as rated by observers.

Methods

A web-based survey was conducted with 203 observers who were unaware of the study’s purpose. They assessed preoperative and postoperative images of 12 female patients using the Delphi method to ensure appropriate image selection and unbiased ratings. Observers rated the images on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more favorable perceptions.

Results

The observer group consisted of 108 women (53.2%) and 95 men (46.8%), with an age range of 18 to 61 years. The mean age perceived by observers decreased from 51.75 years before surgery to 42.10 years after surgery, indicating a significant reduction in perceived age (p = 0.01). Additionally, postsurgical assessments showed significant increases in perceived attractiveness, success, and overall health.

Conclusions

Upper eyelid blepharoplasty significantly enhances how patients are perceived in terms of youthfulness, attractiveness, and success. These findings underscore the positive impact of cosmetic eyelid surgery on public perception.

Facial assessment often begins with the eyes, which are frequently identified as the focal point during initial encounters. This is supported by eye-tracking research that indicates the eye region is pivotal in age estimation and gauging attention [1,2]. The appearance of the eyes can influence perceptions of vitality and fatigue; eyes that exhibit droopiness or excess skin may contribute to a person’s older and wearier appearance, affecting their perceived attractiveness [24]. Consequently, cosmetic interventions like blepharoplasty have become sought-after procedures to rejuvenate the eye area, thereby enhancing overall facial aesthetics.

Upper eyelid blepharoplasty, in particular, has been documented as one of the most frequent facial cosmetic surgeries performed globally, with over 1.4 million procedures reported by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery in 2016 alone [5]. This study hypothesizes that blepharoplasty contributes not only to a more youthful and attractive appearance but also positively influences societal perceptions of health and success.

The objective of this study was to evaluate how naive observers perceive changes in a patient’s age, attractiveness, success, and health following upper eyelid blepharoplasty, reflecting the broader impact of cosmetic surgery beyond mere aesthetic enhancement.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital (No. 186-02.12.2020). All participants provided written informed consent, which were electronically secured, maintaining data confidentiality according to ethical standards. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

The study included Turkish-speaking adults over the age of 18 years, excluding minors and individuals with psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia or autism, which could affect facial perception. Responses were excluded if the survey was not completed in full.

Photographs were taken under controlled settings before and 6 months after upper eyelid blepharoplasty to ensure consistency across all images. Uniform lighting, camera settings, and backdrops were used to minimize biases associated with external variables. The postoperative images featured only patients who had not undergone any other facial procedures during the interim.

To select standardized patient images that accurately reflected typical candidates for blepharoplasty and the expected surgical outcomes, the Delphi method was employed. This involved a panel of experts who reviewed potential images in several rounds of evaluation, allowing consensus to be reached on the most representative photographs for use in the study.

Observers were randomly selected and tasked with evaluating these images using a validated visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more favorable perceptions. Observers assessed the perceived age of each individual by using a slider bar ranging from 30 to 90 years, with 1-year increments. Subsequently, they rated facial attractiveness on a scale from 0 (least attractive) to 10 (most attractive). Participants then evaluated the perceived success of the individual on a scale from 0 (complete failure) to 10 (extremely successful), followed by an assessment of perceived healthiness on a scale from 0 (extremely unhealthy) to 10 (extremely healthy). The observer rating questions and scale descriptions are shown in Table 1.

Observer rating questions and scale descriptions

Each observer’s survey included images that were not paired, ensuring that preoperative and postoperative photos of the same patient were not presented together to avoid recognition bias. The sequence of the photographs was not disclosed to the observers to maintain an unbiased assessment. Demographic details, including any history of plastic surgery, were recorded for each observer.

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp). Paired sample t-tests were applied as appropriate to compare changes in perceptions before and after surgery, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results

The study was conducted between January and February 2022, with 203 observers completing the web-based survey. The demographic distribution of the observers included 108 women (53.2%) and 95 men (46.8%), with an age range of 18 to 61 years and a mean age of 34.06 ± 7.3 years. Notably, 39 observers (19.1%) had previously undergone plastic surgery, as shown in Table 2, which details the demographic characteristics of the sample.

Demographic characteristics of observers

The analysis of the observer ratings revealed significant changes in perceived age following blepharoplasty. Prior to surgery, the mean estimated age was 51.75 ± 9.78 years, which decreased to 42.10 ± 9.34 years post surgery, indicating a statistically significant reduction (p = 0.01). This finding suggests that blepharoplasty led observers to perceive patients as being younger.

Further, there was no significant difference in the evaluations between observers who had undergone aesthetic surgery themselves and those who had not (p = 0.01), suggesting that personal experience with plastic surgery did not bias the assessments of the patients.

Table 3 outlines the changes in observer ratings for attractiveness, perceived success, and overall health. Postoperative assessments showed that patients who underwent upper eyelid blepharoplasty were rated higher on mean attractiveness scores, perceived success, and overall health compared to their preoperative ratings. These increases were statistically significant and highlight the positive impact of the surgical intervention on observer perceptions.

Observer evaluations

Discussion

In this investigation, observers who were unaware of the patients’ surgical status perceived individuals in postoperative images of upper eyelid blepharoplasty as significantly younger, more attractive, more successful, and healthier. This aligns with previous studies on facial aesthetics, which suggest that cosmetic enhancements can substantially alter public perception [6,7].

Our findings contribute uniquely to the literature, as this is, to our knowledge, the first study focusing exclusively on upper eyelid blepharoplasty. The results indicate that this procedure not only reduces age appearance but also enhances perceived personal success and health, likely improving interpersonal interactions.

The negative social impacts of conditions like blepharosalacia and dermatosalacia, which can detrimentally affect first impressions by making individuals appear older and more fatigued, were highlighted in research by Bullock et al. [8]. Our study extends these observations by showing that corrective surgery can inversely improve such perceptions. Similarly, widening the palpebral aperture has been demonstrated to make patients look less tired and more engaged, suggesting enhancements in how their personalities are perceived [9,10]. The study by Reilly et al. [11] further supports this, with findings that patients undergoing lower eyelid surgery appeared more attractive and trustworthy post operation.

Research has consistently shown that attractiveness can confer numerous advantages in social situations, with more attractive individuals perceived as having more desirable personalities and leading more successful lives [12,13]. Our study suggests that upper eyelid blepharoplasty can contribute to these perceptions, supporting findings from a study by Jones et al. [14], which showed increased confidence and perceived cuteness post surgery. One study found that attractive people have more socially desirable personalities, live happier lives, and experience more success than less attractive people [15]. Supporting our study, research examining the outcomes of facial cosmetic surgery showed that patients who underwent upper eyelid blepharoplasty appeared cuter and more confident after the surgery [16]. While blepharoplasty is typically aimed at rejuvenating appearance, our findings illuminate broader implications for a patient’s social interactions and personal satisfaction.

However, this study has certain limitations. While the participant pool of observers was balanced in terms of sex, it was limited in size and included only female patients. Future research could address these limitations by incorporating a larger and more diverse sample of both observers and patients, thereby enhancing the generalizability of the findings and confirming the promising results observed in this study.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that upper eyelid blepharoplasty significantly enhances perceptions of attractiveness, health, and success, confirming the profound impact of cosmetic surgery on social perceptions.

Acknowledgements

None.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest:

None.

Funding:

None.

References

1. Iskra A, Tomc HG. Eye-tracking analysis of face observing and face recognition. J Graph Eng Des 2016;7:5–11.
2. Nguyen HT, Isaacowitz DM, Rubin PA. Age- and fatigue-related markers of human faces: an eye-tracking study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:355–60.
3. Prantl L, Heidekrueger PI, Broer PN, et al. Female eye attractiveness: where beauty meets science. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:73–9.
4. Swanson E. Objective assessment of change in apparent age after facial rejuvenation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:1124–31.
5. Honigman RJ, Phillips KA, Castle DJ. A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:1229–37.
6. Nellis JC, Ishii M, Papel ID, et al. Association of face-lift surgery with social perception, age, attractiveness, health, and success. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017;19:311–7.
7. Zimm AJ, Modabber M, Fernandes V, et al. Objective assessment of perceived age reversal and improvement in attractiveness after aging face surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013;15:405–10.
8. Bullock JD, Warwar RE, Bienenfeld DG, et al. Psychosocial implications of blepharoptosis and dermatochalasis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2001;99:65–72.
9. Said CP, Sebe N, Todorov A. Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion 2009;9:260–4.
10. Ramsey JL, Langlois JH, Hoss RA, et al. Origins of a stereotype: categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants. Dev Sci 2004;7:201–11.
11. Reilly MJ, Tomsic JA, Fernandez SJ, Davison SP. Effect of facial rejuvenation surgery on perceived attractiveness, femininity, and personality. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015;17:202–7.
12. Rhodes G, Yoshikawa S, Palermo R, et al. Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism. Perception 2007;36:1244–52.
13. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol 2006;57:199–226.
14. Jones BC, Little AC, Feinberg DR, et al. The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 2004;25:24–30.
15. Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol 1972;24:285–90.
16. Parsa KM, Gao W, Lally J, et al. Evaluation of personality perception in men before and after facial cosmetic surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019;21:369–74.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Observer rating questions and scale descriptions

Category Question Scale type Scale range
Age What would you guess is this person’s age? Slider bar 30–90 yr (1-yr increments)
Attractiveness How attractive do you find this face? Visual analog scale 0 (least attractive) to 10 (most attractive)
Success How successful do you think this person is? Visual analog scale 0 (complete failure) to 10 (extremely successful)
Health How healthy do you think this person appears? Visual analog scale 0 (extremely unhealthy) to 10 (extremely healthy)

Table 2

Demographic characteristics of observers

Characteristic Value (n = 203)
Age (yr) 34.06 ± 7.3 (18–61)
 Male 34.43 ± 7.8
 Female 33.74 ± 6.8
Sex
 Male 95 (46.8)
 Female 108 (53.2)
Aesthetic operation
 Yes 39 (19.2)
 No 164 (80.8)

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range), mean ± standard deviation, or number (%).

Table 3

Observer evaluations

Category Preoperative assessment Postoperative assessment p-value
Health 6.29 ± 2.07 6.81 ± 2.02 0.01
Attractiveness 4.54 ± 2.34 5.45 ± 2.37 0.01
Success 5.84 ± 2.09 6.13 ± 2.08 0.01

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.