An Overview of the Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study by the Korean Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus

Article information

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2021;35(5):355-359
Publication date (electronic) : 2021 July 8
doi :
On behalf of : for Korean Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
1Strabismus & Pediatric Ophthalmology Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Kim’s Eye Hospital, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
3Department of Ophthalmology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
4Department of Ophthalmology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
5Department of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
6Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
7Department of Ophthalmology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
8Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
9Department of Ophthalmology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding Author: Key Hwan Lim, MD, PhD. Department of Ophthalmology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul 07985, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2650-5659, Fax: 82-2-2654-4334, E-mail:

KIEMS writing committee (listed in alphabetical order of last name)

Seung-Hee Baek, Hee-young Choi, Dong Gyu Choi, Dae Hee Kim, Dong Cheol Lee, Se-Youp Lee, Han Woong Lim, Hyun Taek Lim, Key Hwan Lim, Won Yeol Ryu, Hee Kyung Yang

Investigator’s name (listed in the order of number of patients which investigators contributed)

Hee-young Choi (Pusan National University), Hyun Taek Lim (Asan Medical Center), Jae Ho Jung (Seoul National University), Seung-Hee Baek (Kim’s Eye Hospital), Mi Young Choi (Chungbuk National University), Jeong-Min Hwang (Seoul National University), Su Jin Kim (Pusan National University), Yeon-hee Lee (Chungnam National University), Sueng-Han Han (Yonsei University), Shin Hae Park (The Catholic University of Korea), Haeng-Jin Lee (Jeonbuk National University), Sook-Young Kim (Daegu Catholic University), Se-Youp Lee (Keimyung University), Hyo Jung Gye (Nune Eye Hospital), So Young Kim (Soonchunhyang University), Sun Young Shin (The Catholic University of Korea), Jihyun Park (Nune Eye Hospital), Won Yeol Ryu (Dong-A University), Hye Sung Park (Siloam Eye Hospital), Dae Hee Kim (Kim’s Eye Hospital), Hae Jung Paik (Gachon University), Dong Gyu Choi (Hallym University), Joo Yeon Lee (Hallym University), Hee Kyung Yang (Seoul National University), Shin Yeop Oh (Sungkyunkwan University), Soo Jung Lee (Inje University), Seung Ah Chung (Ajou University), Jin Choi (Inje University), Sei Yeul Oh (Sungkyunkwan University), Mirae Kim (Nune Eye Hospital), Young-Woo Suh (Korea University), Nam Yeo Kang (The Catholic University of Korea), Hae Ri Yum (The Catholic University of Korea), Sun A Kim (Sungmo Eye Hospital), Hyuna Kim (Soonchunhyang University), Jinu Han (Yonsei University), Yoonae A. Cho (Nune Eye Hospital), Hyunkyung Kim (Hangil Eye Hospital), Helen Lew (CHA University), Dong Cheol Lee (Keimyung University), Sang Hoon Rah (Yonsei University), Yung-Ju Yoo (Kangwon National University), Key Hwan Lim (Ewha Womans University), Hyosook Ahn (Asan Medical Center), Ungsoo S. Kim (Kim’s Eye Hospital), Jung Ho Lee (Daegu Premier Eye Center), Hokyung Choung (Seoul National University), Seong-Joon Kim (Seoul National University), Hyeshin Jeon (Pusan National University), Hyun Jin Shin (Konkuk University), So Young Han (Sungkyunkwan University), Hwan Heo (Chonnam National University), Soochul Park (Saevit Eye Hospital), Songhee Park (Soonchunhyang University), Sung Eun Kyung (Magok Dream Light Eye Clinic), Changzoo Kim (Kosin University), Kyung-Ah Park (Sungkyunkwan University), Eun Hye Jung (Eulji University), Eun Hee Hong (Hanyang University), Han Woong Lim (Hanyang University), Daye Choi (Kim’s Eye Hospital), Youn Joo Choi (Hallym University), Nam Ju Moon (Chung Ang University), In Jeong Lyu (Korea Cancer Center Hospital), Soon Young Cho (Dongguk University)

Received 2021 June 19; Revised 2021 July 1; Accepted 2021 July 5.


The Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study (KIEMS), which was initiated by the Korean Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, is a collaborative multicenter study on intermittent exotropia in Korea. The KIEMS was designed to provide comprehensive information, including subjective and objective findings of intermittent exotropia in a large study population. A total of 65 strabismus specialists in 53 institutions contributed to this study, which, to date, is one of the largest clinical studies on intermittent exotropia. In this article, we provide a detailed methodology of the KIEMS to help future investigations that may use the KIEMS data.


The Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study (KIEMS), which was initiated by the Korean Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, is a nationwide, cross-sectional study to investigate intermittent exotropia in Korea. Intermittent exotropia is the most common form of strabismus in pediatric populations in Korea [1,2] and in several other Asian countries [36]. It is a clinical entity that shows diverse and variable clinical characteristics. There have been numerous studies that described clinical characteristics of intermittent exotropia, but the findings of those studies were insufficient in providing comprehensive information about the condition due to relatively small sample sizes, a lack of detailed questions on disease history or observations in daily life, and inadequate investigative methods and parameters. This study aimed to describe overall symptomatologic information and clinical features of intermittent exotropia in a large population of Korea.

KIEMS Overview

Study summary

This study was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, and multicenter study. The participants were recruited from March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 by 65 strabismus specialists in 53 institutions, of which secondary or tertiary referral centers accounted for 98.1%, in Korea. This study protocol conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board of each institution. Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. Questionnaires and examination forms were pre–distributed to the investigators for the standardization of collected data. Each investigator collected the questionnaires and examination forms from every first visited intermittent exotropia patient. The data collection was conducted in accordance with the Personal Information Protection Act. After private information in the questionnaires and examination forms were anonymized and encrypted (e.g., intended deletion of some privacy information to keep reproducing prior to data collection), the questionnaires and examination forms were collected by the KIEMS committee and were handled centrally.

Inclusion criteria

This study included patients diagnosed with 8 prism diopters or more exodeviation at distant or near fixation, regardless of age or fusion control (including exophoria, intermittent exotropia, and constant exotropia). We excluded patients with congenital ocular anomalies or ocular myopathies. Patients with limitation of ocular motility resulting in incomitant strabismus, including neurologic or paralytic disorders, previous ocular surgical history, including strabismus and visually affecting surgeries, or any conditions affecting the central visual acuity, including anterior segment abnormality, cataracts, retinal diseases, or blepharoptosis (ocular sensory disorders), were excluded. When a patient was suspected to visit multiple institutions, only the first reported data were used to avoid redundancy.


This study collected disease-related information from patients or their guardians using questionnaires. The questions were as follows: the reason for visiting the specialist; the first person who noticed associated symptoms; onset of symptoms; frequency of manifested exotropia noticed per day; guardian’s recognition of the exotropia manifestations (direction of deviation and ocular dominance) [7]; associated symptoms (abnormal head posture, photophobia, glare, reading difficulty, headache, ocular pain, micropsia, or blurring) [810]; frequency of diplopia (at distant or near viewing conditions) [11]; history of occlusion therapy (duration, frequency, and laterality); history of wearing glasses; systemic diseases; history of developmental delay; childbirth history (type of delivery, gestational age, and birth weight) [12]; perinatal medical conditions (birth complications); and history of exotropia in parents and siblings (including a history of strabismus surgery history) [12]. Questionnaires were constructed as a combination of open-ended and multiple-choice questions. An English version of the questionnaire was provided in Supplement 1.

Ophthalmic exams

Ophthalmic exams were done by the investigators according to pre-distributed standardized guidelines and formats. The ophthalmic exams included best corrected visual acuity and cycloplegic refraction data. Strabismus angles were measured at distant (6 m) and near fixation (33 cm) in primary, right-, left-, up-, and down-gaze, and right and left head-tilted position using alternate prism and cover test. If the exotropic angle at distant fixation measured 10 prism diopters or more than at near fixation, exotropic angles at distant and near fixation in the primary position were remeasured after one eye was covered with a patch for 30 minutes to 1 hour (occlusion test of Scobee-Burian) [13]. After the occlusion test, the +3.00 diopter spherical lens test was followed to measure accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio at near fixation [13]. Superior and inferior oblique muscle functions were graded as +1 to +4 for overaction and -1 to -4 for underaction based on the standard photographs [14]. Fusion control was measured both at distant and near fixation, and were graded as “good”, “fair”, or “poor” [14]. Ocular dominance was also assessed at distant and near fixation conditions. For assessing binocular sensory status, Worth four-dot test was done at 6 m of distance, and either Titmus stereotest or random-dot stereograms was done at 40 cm of distance [15]. To investigate the variability of treatment plans among the investigators, investigators were asked to select desirable treatment plans (surgery methods, prescription of glasses, occlusion therapy, or observation plans) for a specific patient. An English version of examination form was provided in Supplement 2.

Study populations

A total of 5,837 cases were collected. The cases missing essential information (individual-identifying information or deviation angle in primary position, 156 cases) or suspected to be redundant (suspected to visit two or more institutions collecting individual-identifying information, 296 cases) were excluded during the review process by the KIEMS committee. The remaining 5,385 cases were included for comprehensive analysis. Male and female participants were 2,592 (48.1%) and 2,793 cases (51.9%), respectively, showing female preponderance, which was similar to a previous study [16]. The mean age of all the included participants was 8.2 ± 7.6 years (mean ± standard deviation). The mean age of the male participants was 8.6 ± 7.3 years, which was higher than that of female participants (7.8 ± 7.8 years) (independent t-test, p < 0.001). Ninety-five percent of the subjects were under 19 years of age, which meant most patients with intermittent exotropia were diagnosed in their childhood, similar with the findings of a previously reported study [17] population-based cohort. PARTICIPANTS: All pediatric (<19 years old. The age distribution of the subjects is depicted in Fig. 1 and Table 1.

Fig. 1

Study population pyramids. Most of the study participants were in their 1st or 2nd decade of life. The female participants were found to be younger than the male subjects (p < 0.001, independent t-test).

Distribution of study population according to age and sex


The KIEMS study is one of the largest clinical studies on intermittent exotropia ever conducted. The study was conducted by experienced strabismus specialists in multiple institutions in Korea, with pre-planned and standardized study protocols. The questionnaires and investigating items covered almost all symptoms and characteristics ever described or reported in intermittent exotropia. Therefore, the KIEMS study can provide objective, detailed, and standardized information about symptomatology and clinical features of intermittent exotropia in Korea. This article can explain the detailed methodology for future research using the KIEMS data.


Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


The KIEMS study was initiated and financially supported by the Korean Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental materials are available from:

Supplement 1

Questionnaire form

Supplement 2

Examination form


1. Choi KW, Koo BS, Lee HY. Preschool vision screening in Korea: results in 2003. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2006;47:112–20.
2. Han KE, Baek SH, Kim SH, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of strabismus in children and adolescents in South Korea: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008–2011. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191857.
3. Matsuo T, Matsuo C. The prevalence of strabismus and amblyopia in Japanese elementary school children. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2005;12:31–6.
4. Chia A, Dirani M, Chan YH, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in young Singaporean Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:3411–7.
5. Pan CW, Zhu H, Yu JJ, et al. Epidemiology of intermittent exotropia in preschool children in China. Optom Vis Sci 2016;93:57–62.
6. Goseki T, Ishikawa H. The prevalence and types of strabismus, and average of stereopsis in Japanese adults. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2017;61:280–5.
7. Han KE, Lim KH. Discrepancies between parental reports and clinical diagnoses of strabismus in Korean children. J AAPOS 2012;16:511–4.
8. Campos EC, Cipolli C. Binocularity and photophobia in intermittent exotropia. Percept Mot Skills 1992;74(3 Pt 2):1168–70.
9. Hirota M, Kanda H, Endo T, et al. Relationship between reading performance and saccadic disconjugacy in patients with convergence insufficiency type intermittent exotropia. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2016;60:326–32.
10. Hirota M, Kanda H, Endo T, et al. Binocular coordination and reading performance during smartphone reading in intermittent exotropia. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:2069–78.
11. Wang FM, Chryssanthou G. Monocular eye closure in intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:941–2.
12. Maconachie GD, Gottlob I, McLean RJ. Risk factors and genetics in common comitant strabismus: a systematic review of the literature. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131:1179–86.
13. Kushner BJ, Morton GV. Distance/near differences in intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:478–86.
14. Rosenbaum AL, Santiago AP. Clinical strabismus management: principles and surgical techniques Philadelphia: Saunders; 1999. p. 17–165.
15. von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Examination of the patient V. In : von Noorden GK, Campos EC, eds. Binocular vision and ocular motility St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 298–307.
16. Nusz KJ, Mohney BG, Diehl NN. Female predominance in intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:546–7.
17. Govindan M, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence and types of childhood exotropia: a population-based study. Ophthalmology 2005;112:104–8.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Study population pyramids. Most of the study participants were in their 1st or 2nd decade of life. The female participants were found to be younger than the male subjects (p < 0.001, independent t-test).

Table 1

Distribution of study population according to age and sex

Age (yr) Male Female Total
Less than 5 689 (40.5) 1,014 (59.5) 1,703
5 to <10 1,298 (49.4) 1,330 (50.6) 2,628
10 to <15 380 (58.1) 274 (41.9) 654
15 to <20 97 (61.8) 60 (38.2) 157
20 to <40 99 (58.6) 70 (41.4) 169
40 to <60 24 (44.4) 30 (55.6) 54
60 or more 5 (25.0) 15 (75.0) 20
Total 2,592 (48.1) 2,793 (51.9) 5,385

Values are presented as number (%) or number.