Korean J Ophthalmol > Volume 27(1); 2013 > Article
Lee, Chun, Baek, and Kim: Relationship of Hypertropia and Excyclotorsion in Superior Oblique Palsy



To evaluate the correlation between hypertropia and excyclotorsion in acquired superior oblique palsy (SOP).


Thirty-one patients with acquired unilateral SOP were recruited for this study. The torsional angle of each patient was assessed via one objective method (fundus photography) and two subjective methods (double Maddox rod test and major amblyoscope). The patient population was divided into two groups (concordance group, n = 19 and discordance group, n = 12) according to the correspondence between the hypertropic eye (paralytic eye) and the more extorted eye (non-fixating eye), which was evaluated by fundus photography.


The mean value of objective torsion was 5.09° ± 3.84°. The subjective excyclotorsion degrees were 5.18° ± 4.11° and 3.65° ± 1.93° as measured by double Maddox rod test and major amblyoscope, respectively. Hypertropia and the excyclotorsional angle did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.257). Although no correlation was found in the discordance group, the concordance group showed a significant and positive correlation between hypertropia and excyclotorsion (p = 0.011).


Torsional deviation was not related to hypertropia. However, in the concordance patients in whom the hypertropic eye showed excyclotorsion, a significant positive correlation was found between hypertropia and excyclotorsion.

Superior oblique palsy (SOP) is the most common isolated cranial nerve palsy induced by trauma, idiopathic, vascular insufficiency, tumor, or iatrogenic factors [1]. The superior oblique muscle has a unique anatomical function because the anterior fibers impart a primarily excyclotorsional force on the globe, while the posterior fibers impart primarily depressing and abducting forces on the globe. For these reasons, patients with unilateral superior oblique muscle palsy generally evidence hypertropia and excyclotorsion of the paretic eye.
SOP is diagnosed by clinical observations of ocular versions, measurements of misalignment of ocular position at the nine cardinal gazes, and head tilt positions [1,2]. Moreover, cyclotorsion is a crucially important feature in SOP. The double Maddox rod test (DMRT), fundus photography, major amblyoscope, and Lancaster test are all regarded as useful tools to evaluate cyclotorsion. These methods may reveal the torsional angle in a subjective or objective manner. The discrepancies among measurements of cyclodeviation have been well established. Na et al. [3] reported that both excyclotorsion and hypertropia showed a significant and positive correlation with inferior oblique overaction (IOOA). Hypertropia and excyclotorsion showed a weaker positive correlation in congenital monocular SOP. However, Na et al. [3]'s report included patient populations with congenital and acquired palsies.
Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the characteristics and the correlation between hypertropia and excyclotorsion in acquired unilateral superior oblique muscle palsy via subjective measuring tests including the DMRT and major amblyoscope, and an objective measuring test involving fundus photography.

Materials and Methods

Clinical charts of 31 patients diagnosed with acquired unilateral superior oblique muscle palsy during March 2007 and February 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. This research study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of Kim's Eye Hospital. The study included patients with acquired unilateral SOP who were diagnosed by a three-step test. Exclusion criterion were as follows: 1) previous extraocular surgery history; 2) any suspected sign of other paralytic strabismus except SOP; 3) presence of bilateral SOP which was defined by right eye hypertropia in left gaze; 4) left hypertropia in right gaze; and 5) positive Bielschowsky head tilt test to either side.
Every patient had a full ophthalmic examination including a visual acuity test and slit-lamp examination. Patients were divided into two groups (concordance group and discordance group) according to the correspondence between the hypertropic eye (paralytic eye) and the more extorted eye (non-fixating eye), as evaluated via fundus photography. For example, if a patient who had a right hypertropia showed a marked excyclotorsion in the right eye, the patient was classified into the concordance group. All data were collected at the first visit.
For the evaluation of hypertropia, an alternate prism cover test was conducted using a 5 m far target in the primary position, up and down gaze, lateral gaze, and bilateral head tilt positions of 30°. IOOA was quantified via the duction version test from grades 1 to 4. Inferior oblique overaction was graded as 1 if the adducted eye was 1 mm above the inferior margin of the fellow eye pupil, grade 2 if it was 2 mm above, grade 3 if it was 3 mm above, and grade 4 if it was 4 mm above.
We employed two subjective methods (DMRT and major amblyoscope) and one objective method (fundus photography) to quantify the cyclotorsion. The DMRT was conducted as followed. Red Maddox rods were placed before both eyes, and a Maddox rod was turned until the two lines were perceived as parallel. In this method the angle of rotation determines subjective excyclotorsion. Another method for measuring subjective excyclotorsion uses the major amblyoscope (ED-011; Takata Ophthalmic Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). Two slides (ST1 and ST2) were used. One slide featuring a vertical line was placed before the non-paretic eye, and another slide marked with a horizontal line was placed before the paretic eye. Patients were asked to describe the angle of the two lines. The investigator rotated the arms of the major amblyoscope until no cyclodeviation was perceived. The required degree of rotation of the slide by the investigator was used as the measurement of cyclodeviation. Fundus photography was conducted using a digital fundus camera (Canon CR6-45NM with Canon EOS 20D; Canon, Tokyo, Japan) with internal fixation. A horizontal line was drawn from the center of the optic disc to the fovea, and the other line was drawn horizontally from the fovea. Usually, the fovea is located slightly inferior in relation to the optic nerve. The angle made by the two lines was the disc foveal angle, and that angle was expressed in terms of tangential value (tan α = b/a) (Fig. 1). This value represented objective excyclotorsion in each eye. Ocular torsion measured by fundus photography was evaluated by the total excyclotorsion, which was the difference between the two eyes. For example, if fundus photography showed a 15° excyclotorsion in the right eye and an 8° excyclotorsion in the left eye, the total excyclotorsion is defined as 7° (15° to 8°).
Data were analyzed using SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results from quantitative variables were expressed as the means ± standard deviation, and comparisons between groups were conducted using non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests. Correlations between tests were assessed via non-parametric Kendall's tau rank correlation. A p-value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.


Data from 31 patients were included in this study. The median age at presentation was 52 years (range, 9 to 75 years) and three of the 31 patients were female.

Vertical and horizontal deviation

The mean degree of hypertropia was measured as 5.83 prism diopters (PD) in primary gaze. Horizontal deviation was observed in 12 patients (38.7%). Among these 12 patients, ten showed an exodeviation (mean value, 9.3 PD; exodeviation more than 8 PD, five patients) and two patients exhibited an esodeviation (6 PD and 9 PD, respectively). Upon presentation, 20 (64.51%) patients evidenced inferior oblique overaction, with a mean grade of 1.45.

Relationship between objective torsion and subjective torsion

The mean value of objective torsion was 5.09° ± 3.84°. The subjective excyclotorsion degrees were 5.18° ± 4.11° suggested by the DMRT and 3.65° ± 1.93° using the major amblyoscope. We detected no significant differences among tests (Friedman's test, p = 0.257) (Table 1). The degree of torsion measured via fundus photography and the amplitude of the major amblyoscope measurements had a positive relationship. However, this was not a significant relationship (correlation coefficient = 0.216, p = 0.293). Although the degree of torsion in fundus photography and the degree of torsion measured by the DMRT had a negative relationship, these results were not significant (correlation coefficient = -0.122, p = 0.422).

Relationship between hypertropia and excyclotorsion

The degree of hypertropia and the degree of torsion measured using fundus photography were not significantly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0.249, p = 0.072). The degree of hypertropia and the amplitude of subjective excyclotorsion, as measured by the major amblyoscope and DMRT, also evidenced no significant relationship (correlation coefficient = 0.108, p = 0.591 and correlation coefficient = -0.124, p = 0.424).

Concordance group and discordance group

Nineteen of 31 patients comprised the concordance group (61%). No significant differences were noted between the concordance and the discordance groups (Table 2). In the concordance group, a significant positive correlation between hypertropia and excyclotorsion as determined via fundus photography was detected (p = 0.011). However, there was no significant correlation between hypertropia and torsional angles in the discordance group, according to measurements conducted via the three different methods (Table 3).


There are various methods by which the degree of excyclotorsion can be determined [4]. The relevant methods were categorized into objective and subjective methods. We employed fundus photography for objective torsional measurements and major amblyoscope and DMRT as subjective measurements. The objective and subjective methods were not correlated. With regard to the subjective methods, the major amblyoscope results were positively correlated with the objective results, as compared with the DMRT, which evidenced a negative correlation. However, none of these results were significant. Seventy-three percent of patients evidenced excyclotorsion in the DMRT, and the mean degree of excyclotorsion was 5.18°. The excyclotorsion measured by the amblyoscope was 3.65°. These results were similar to those of a previous study by von Noorden et al. [5] who reported that excyclotorsion measured via the DMRT occurred in 76% of patients with unilateral SOP, with a mean degree of excyclotropia of 3.5° [5].
The cyclotorsion of fundus photography was similar to that seen in the DMRT results, and was larger than the subjective torsion (fundus photography 5.09°, DMRT 5.3° and major amblyoscope 3.9°). These findings demonstrate the similarity to the results reported by Ruttum and von Noorden [6]. They suggested that discrepancy in the testing results may have been due to fusional function. It may also result from diverse fusional power in various situations. Fusional power may contribute to the diminution of the torsional angle and result in the reduction of torsional deviation in the major amblyoscope. Therefore, the angle measured using the major amblyoscope was the smallest among the tests.
Hypertropia is induced by inferior oblique overaction of the paretic eye. Inferior oblique overaction also causes excyclotorsion, and alternatively, pseudo-overaction of SOP of the nonparetic eye can cause hypertropia [7-9]. In the relationship between hypertropia and excyclotorsion, 19 patients showed hypertropia as a demonstration of this relationship. Olivier and von Noorden [10] reported that approximately 75% of these cases were attributable to a coincidence due to fixation preference. Our results were slightly lower than in a previous study. This may be because all the cases in the present study were an acquired form. Patients with acquired SOP may more commonly have a fixation preference than patients with congenital SOP, and thus the patients may continue to have a fixation preference after developing SOP. In this study, the relationship between hypertropia and excyclotorsion evidenced no significant correlation among patients. However, objective excyclotorsion, which was evaluated via fundus photography, showed a significant positive correlation in the concordance group after patients were divided into two groups according to fixation preference. If patients in the discordance group fixated with their paralytic eye, a significant correlation would be noted between objective excyclotorsion and hypertropia. As a consequence, in the case of acquired SOP with patients who fixate using their nonparalytic eye, the objective excyclotorsion method may be superior to subjective methods. Because the angle of deviation is largely measured according to Herring's law in the discordance group, patients who fixate with the paralytic eye may not have accurate measurements.
In terms of finding no correlation between hypertropia and excyclotorsion, anatomical factors may be relevant to the characteristics of SOP. Mollan et al. [11] recently identified 133 cases of SOP. Among the unilateral isolated cases, 38.3% were considered congenital, 29.3% followed trauma, and 23.3% were presumed to be vasculopathic in origin, while no cause could be established in 7.5%. Based on their results, more than half of the cases of acquired unilateral SOP were attributable to trauma or vasculopathy. We suggested that the selective attack of the superior oblique muscle fiber may result in dominant hypertropia or dominant excyclotorsion. If the mechanical damage or vascular ischemia involves the anterior fiber, excyclotorsion may be the result. Conversely, if the damage or ischemia affects the posterior fiber, hypertropia may develop.
In conclusion, the relationship between the amount of excyclotorsion and hypertropia in acquired SOP is weak. But in the concordance group, a significant positive correlation between hypertropia and excyclotorsion was expressed. Knowing the relationship of objective torsion and subjective torsion in patients with acquired SOP, and fixation preference can help understand acquired SOP and help predict the surgical results and operative quantitative measurements.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


1. Helveston EM. Diagnosis and management of superior oblique palsy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1985;25:69-77.
crossref pmid
2. Helveston EM, Mora JS, Lipsky SN, et al. Surgical treatment of superior oblique palsy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1996;94:315-328.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Na KS, Lee SY, Lee YC. Ocular torsion in unilateral superior oblique palsy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2007;48:1388-1393.
4. Bixenman WW, von Noorden GK. Apparent foveal displacement in normal subjects and in cyclotropia. Ophthalmology 1982;89:58-62.
crossref pmid
5. Von Noorden GK, Murray E, Wong SY. Superior oblique paralysis: a review of 270 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:1771-1776.
crossref pmid
6. Ruttum M, von Noorden GK. The Bagolini striated lens test for cyclotropia. Doc Ophthalmol 1984;58:131-139.
crossref pmid
7. Kushner BJ, Kraft SE, Vrabec M. Ocular torsional movements in humans with normal and abnormal ocular motility. Part I. Objective measurements. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1984;21:172-177.
crossref pmid
8. Souza-Dias C. The diagnosis and treatment of bilateral masked superior oblique palsy. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;106:371-373.
crossref pmid
9. Kraft SP, Scott WE. Masked bilateral superior oblique palsy: clinical features and diagnosis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1986;23:264-272.
crossref pmid
10. Olivier P, von Noorden GK. Excyclotropia of the nonparetic eye in unilateral superior oblique muscle paralysis. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;93:30-33.
crossref pmid
11. Mollan SP, Edwards JH, Price A, et al. Aetiology and outcomes of adult superior oblique palsies: a modern series. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:640-644.
crossref pmid
Fig. 1
The method to calculate the torsional angle using the fundus photography. A horizontal line was drawn from the center of the optic disc to the fovea (c), and the other line was drawn horizontally from the fovea (a). The angle made by the two lines was the disc foveal angle (α), and we expressed that angle in terms of tangential value (tan α = b / a).
Table 1
The subjective and objective hypertropia in each extorsion method

DMRT = double Maddox rod test.

Table 2
Hypertropia and each extorsion method between the two groups

PD = prism diopters; DMRT = double Maddox rod test.

Table 3
The correlation between hypertropia and each extorsion method in the two groups

DMRT = double Maddox rod test.

*Kendal tau-b; p = 0.011.

METRICS Graph View
  • 12 Crossref
  • 17 Scopus
  • 1,413 View
  • 4 Download
Related articles

Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2022 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next