Radiation-Induced Neovascular Glaucoma: Dose and Volume Issues

Article information

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24(6):384-385
Publication date (electronic) : 2010 November 23
doi : https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2010.24.6.384
Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Dear Editor:

I read with great interest the article by Jeon et al., titled '[Related article:] Neovascular glaucoma following stereotactic radiosurgery for an optic nerve glioma: a case report' [1]. Eight months after the patient underwent radiosurgery in the affected orbit, the intraglobular mass regressed to a partially residual retroglobular nodule; however, neovascular glaucoma (NVG) developed in the same eye. The authors stated that the stereotactic image-guided robotic radiosurgery using the Cyberknife system for the treatment of optic nerve glioma (ONG) might cause NVG and should be selectively utilized. Although there seems to be a causal relationship between radiosurgery and the development of NVG, some issues need to be clarified.

First, the authors suggested the post-radiation development of cataract in the affected eye supports their speculation that radiation effects may be the most likely causative factor of NVG in their case. To demonstrate that a complication is radiation-induced, the radiation dose must be taken into account. The radiobiologic model of acute and late effects on normal human organs according to the radiation dose and volume has been well established through in vivo and in vitro studies, and it is true that radiotherapy can affect the retina, lens, conjunctiva, lacriminal apparatus, optic nerve, and eyelids. However, retinitis and optic neuropathy are found to occur following only high doses of radiation greater than 50 to 65 Gy, whereas cataracts are reported to develop following small radiation doses as low as 10 to 18 Gy, due to the differences in the sensitivities of the normal organs [2]. In the present case, the total irradiated dose of 16 Gy in four fractions was sufficiently high to cause lens opacity but was too low to have any effects on the retina or the optic nerve (16 Gy of four fractions equals 25 Gy with 2 Gy per fraction according to the biologically effective dose calculation, α/β=3). In the uveal melanoma cases, which the authors referred to as "NVG after stereotactic radiosurgery for intraocular tumors," the target dose for the tumor apex was set at greater than 100 Gy. Moreover, plaque brachytherapy was used in those melanoma cases, instead of stereotactic radiosurgery [3].

Second, the volume irradiated is also an important factor in the development of NVG. Recently, Hirasawa et al. [4] found radiation damage to the anterior segment of the eye and the optic disk to be a risk factor for NVG based on a dose-volume histogram analysis. In their study, both the dose to the anterior segment of the eye and the optic disc and the volume irradiated with greater than 50 Gy were statistically significant factors contributing to the development of NVG. Current advances in planning techniques for stereotactic radiosurgery aimed to minimize the dose to the anterior segment and the disc can reduce the risk of this complication. One of these new instruments, the CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), used in this case, enables delivery of high radiation doses to the target with a much steeper dose gradient outside the tumor volume compared with those of other treatment systems that have been reported to produce NVG [5]. Using the Cyberknife system, far less than 50% of the total dose generally affects the anterior segment of the eye. Dose and volume issues need to be carefully considered when determining the cause-and-effect relationships between radiation therapy and its associated complications.

References

1. Jeon S, Lee NY, Park CK. Neovascular glaucoma following stereotactic radiosurgery for an optic nerve glioma: a case report. Korean J Ophthalmol 2010;24:252–255. 20714392.
2. Kline LB, Kim JY, Ceballos R. Radiation optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology 1985;92:1118–1126. 4047605.
3. Bergman L, Nilsson B, Lundell G, et al. Ruthenium brachytherapy for uveal melanoma, 1979-2003: survival and functional outcomes in the Swedish population. Ophthalmology 2005;112:834–840. 15878063.
4. Hirasawa N, Tsuji H, Ishikawa H, et al. Risk factors for neovascular glaucoma after carbon ion radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma using dose-volume histogram analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:538–543. 17141971.
5. Daftari IK, Petti PL, Shrieve DC, Phillips TL. Newer radiation modalities for choroidal tumors. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2006;46:69–79. 16365556.

Article information Continued