Korean J Ophthalmol > Volume 39(6); 2025 > Article
Kim and Kim: Ten-Year Trends of Intravitreal Injection in South Korea Using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service Data

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to analyze the annual trends of intravitreal injection (IVI) in South Korea.

Methods

This retrospective study examined data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA)’s Health and Medical Big Data Open Portal. We investigated the number of patients who underwent IVIs and the total number of IVIs in Korea using the procedure code from 2014 to 2023, categorized by age group and type of healthcare facility. Patients aged under 40 years were excluded from the analysis. Additionally, trends in healthcare expenditures were analyzed.

Results

The number of patients undergoing IVI and the total number of IVI increased steadily, resulting in 92,124 patients (178.1 patients per 100,000 persons) and 291,784 injections in 2023, which contributed to an increase in medical expenses. The analysis of 10-year age intervals revealed that patients in their 70s were the most frequent recipients of IVI. The prevalence of IVI at primary healthcare facilities has been steadily increasing, from 20% in 2014 to 33% in 2023.

Conclusions

The patients receiving IVI and the total number of IVI have been steadily increasing, particularly in primary healthcare settings. Overall, medical expenses continue to rise. The findings of this study provide valuable evidence for the efficient allocation of medical resources in the future.

Intravitreal injection (IVI) is a therapeutic procedure which is essential for the direct administration of drug into the vitreous body. With the introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medications in 2004, the frequency of IVIs has significantly increased. The initial therapeutic indication was neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and it has been extended to various retinal diseases, such as retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic macular edema (DME) and choroidal neovascularization [1].
Intravitreal anti-VEGF medications such as bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and faricimab are currently used in South Korea. Moreover, IVI using steroid regimen such as triamcinolone acetonide or dexamethasone intravitreal implant is frequently used for reducing inflammatory aspects in the eye [2,3].
A previous study conducted in the United Kingdom investigated historical trends in IVI rates, demonstrating a steady annual increase [4]. The annual injection rate increased from 0.4 episodes per 100,000 population in 1989-1990 to 10.7 in 2006-2007, and then rose exponentially to 59.5 by 2008-2009. Furthermore, a study conducted at a tertiary hospital in the United Kingdom demonstrated a consistent increase in annual IVI volumes, from 4,143 injections in 2009 to 44,924 in 2019, representing approximately an 11-fold rise over the decade [5]. However, no nationwide studies have been conducted over the past decade, and given the unique characteristics of the national insurance system in South Korea, there is a growing need for updated research reflecting the current domestic context.
Previously in South Korea, IVI was primarily performed in secondary or tertiary healthcare facilities due to the complexity and cost of diagnostic equipment. However, with an aging population and the wider availability of diagnostic tools for various retinal diseases, primary healthcare facilities (local clinics) have increasingly begun to perform IVI, and their numbers continue to grow. This study aims to analyze annual trends in IVI, along with associated medical costs and the evolving role of healthcare institutions providing IVI in Korea.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This retrospective observational study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, with a waiver of informed consent (No. X-2412-945-901). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study participants

We retrospectively analyzed data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA)’s Health and Medical Big Data Open Portal (https://opendata.hira.or.kr/) to determine the number of patients who underwent IVIs and the total number of IVIs in Korea from 2014 to 2023. This publicly accessible database allows users to enter specific prescription codes to retrieve detailed data associated with those codes. Patients aged under 40 years were excluded from the analysis, as IVIs in this age group are rarely performed for retinal diseases such as AMD or DME.

Variables

We queried “intravitreal injection” (procedure code S5070) as procedure codes. Healthcare facilities were categorized as primary (local clinics), secondary (hospitals and general hospitals), and tertiary (tertiary hospitals). We examined the number of patients who underwent IVI procedures and the total number of IVIs conducted annually, along with age- and healthcare facility-specific distributions. Medical expenses were defined as the costs of these examinations, calculated based on the purchasing power parity (PPP) conversion factor for Korea corresponding to each respective year.

Results

According to data from the HIRA’s Health and Medical Big Data Open Portal, 92,124 patients (178.1 patients per 100,000 persons) underwent IVI in 2023, compared to 26,005 patients (51.2 patients per 100,000 persons) in 2014. From 2014 to 2023, the number of patients undergoing IVI demonstrated a steady increase (Table 1). The total number of IVI was 54,026 in 2014, rising significantly to 291,784 in 2023, reflecting a steep upward trend over this period (Table 2). In all observed years, both the number of male patients receiving IVI and the total number of procedures performed in male patients were higher than those in female patients (Figs. 1, 2).
In terms of healthcare expenditure trends, total medical costs associated with IVI was 44,507,625 PPP dollars in 2023, compared with 5,426,462 PPP dollars in 2014. The overall medical expenses of IVI have consistently increased since 2014 (Table 3 and Fig. 3).
Analysis by 10-year age intervals revealed that patients in their 70s underwent the most IVI procedures, followed by those in their 60s (Table 1 and Fig. 4). An increasing trend was observed in the number of patients undergoing IVI per 100,000 persons with advancing age, particularly from the 40s to the 70s (Table 1).
From 2014 to 2019, tertiary healthcare facilities recorded the highest number of IVI each year. Secondary healthcare facilities had the next highest numbers and recorded the highest number of IVI performed from 2019 to 2022. The number of IVI performed at primary healthcare facilities steadily increased from 2014, with primary healthcare facilities recording the second highest numbers since 2022 (Fig. 5). The percentage of total IVIs performed at primary healthcare facilities increased from 20% in 2014 to 33% in 2023.

Discussion

In this study, we examined the trends in the number of patients undergoing IVI and the distribution across different types of healthcare institutions in Korea from 2014 to 2023. During this period, both the number of patients receiving IVI and the total number of IVI gradually increased, especially at primary healthcare facilities.
This may be primarily attributed to the growing prevalence of diseases requiring IVI, such as AMD, DME, and RVO [6-8]. In conditions requiring IVI, treatment typically necessitates regular, ongoing injections rather than achieving complete remission, leading to a cumulative increase in the number of patients [9,10]. Moreover, the development of novel therapeutics such as brolucizumab and faricimab has expanded the range of available treatment options, leading to an increase in the number of IVIs [11,12].
The growing number of approved biosimilars may have also played a role in this increasing trend. ranibizumab biosimilars such as SB-11 (Amelivu, Samsung Bioepis) and CKD-701 (LucenBS, Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical) have been approved by the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and have been in clinical use since 2022. Additionally, aflibercept biosimilars, such as SB-15 (Afilivu, Celltrion) and CT-P42 (Eydenzelt, Celltrion), received MFDS approval in 2024 and is currently available in the South Korean market [13]. The introduction of these biosimilar agents is expected to reduce the economic burden on patients, which may potentially lead to an increase in the overall number of IVIs in the future.
This trend can be also explained by changes in healthcare policy. In the case of AMD, the number of reimbursable anti-VEGF injections was limited to 10 in January 2013 but was increased to 14 in November 2014. By December 2017, the restriction on the number of IVI was removed entirely, and this change may have led to the increase in IVI [14]. Additionally, the approval of treat-and-extend protocols under insurance coverage has allowed for a further increase in the frequency of injections. As the number of patients receiving IVI and the total number of IVI gradually increased, the overall healthcare expenditures are also on the rise (Fig. 3).
Male patients had a higher incidence of IVI, both in terms of the number of individuals receiving the procedure and the total number of injections performed, compared to female patients in all observed years. This may be attributed to the positive association between AMD and men [7]. Furthermore, Arthur et al. [15] reported that the pathological changes in diabetic macular edema result in greater retinal thickening in men than in women, which aligns with our study’s finding that IVI procedure was more frequently administered in male patients.
The age group with the highest number of patients undergoing IVI was those in their 70s, followed by those in their 60s. This trend is likely because conditions that require IVI, such as AMD and RVO, are prevalent in these age groups [6,8]. Considering the demographics of these conditions, it is logical that the number of examinations is highest among older age groups.
Regarding the distribution of healthcare facilities performing IVI, we observed an increasing number of patients undergoing this procedure in primary care facilities over the years. This trend is likely due to the simplicity of performing IVI in local clinics and increased accessibility of diagnostic equipment, such as optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography in local clinics [16]. Recently, the availability of biosimilars such as ranibizumab and aflibercept has expanded treatment options at a more affordable cost. Consequently, IVIs are now more commonly administered in local clinics.
The major limitation of this study is the absence of specific diagnostic information for which IVI was performed, due to the lack of clinical data in the dataset. Therefore, disease-specific analyses were not available due to this limitation. Further studies that include diagnostic codes and information on specific anti-VEGF agents may provide more clinically meaningful results. Secondly, since bevacizumab is not a reimbursed medication in South Korea, its procedure code was not included in claims data, resulting in an underestimation of the actual number of injections administered. However, a retrospective study from a secondary healthcare institution in Korea reported that, over a 6-month period, 2,929 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were administered, of which 693 (23.7%) were bevacizumab [17]. Considering that reimbursement criteria in South Korea differ by disease and are dependent on factors such as visual acuity or optical coherence tomography findings, it is likely that bevacizumab was administered in cases not meeting the reimbursement criteria. As tertiary hospitals may utilize a greater proportion of reimbursed agents such as ranibizumab or aflibercept, it can be inferred that bevacizumab accounts for approximately 20% to 30% of all IVIs in clinical practice. Despite these limitations, this study holds clinical significance as it utilizes objective and reliable big data and is the first comprehensive analysis of trends in IVI practices in South Korea.
In conclusion, over the past decade in Korea, there has been a gradual increase in both the number of patients undergoing IVI and number of procedures performed. The highest number of IVI were conducted on patients in their 70s, and healthcare costs have increased annually. Moreover, an increasing number of IVIs performed in primary healthcare facilities was observed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first nationwide study to analyze annual trends in IVI procedures in South Korea. The results of this study offer meaningful insights by identifying distinct patterns in IVI utilization, which may reflect broader demographic and institutional changes. Furthermore, by analyzing the increase in total medical expenditure related to IVIs, this study provides important foundational data to inform future discussions on healthcare policy, insurance coverage, and infrastructure planning for retinal disease management. These results may serve as valuable evidence for the efficient allocation of medical resources, and policy- driven strategies will be required to address the rising patient demand and associated financial burden.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest:

None.

Acknowledgements:

None.

Funding:

This study was supported by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (No. 18-2023-0014). The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

References

1. Cehofski LJ, Honore B, Vorum H. A review: proteomics in retinal artery occlusion, retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy and acquired macular disorders. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:907.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Lashay A, Riazi-Esfahani H, Mirghorbani M, Yaseri M. Intravitreal medications for retinal vein occlusion: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2019;14:336-66.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
3. Seo JW, Park IW. Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of diabetic macular edema. Korean J Ophthalmol 2009;23:17-22.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Keenan TD, Wotton CJ, Goldacre MJ. Trends over time and geographical variation in rates of intravitreal injections in England. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:413-8.
crossref pmid
5. Chopra R, Preston GC, Keenan TDL, et al. Intravitreal injections: past trends and future projections within a UK tertiary hospital. Eye (Lond) 2022;36:1373-8.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Park JY, Park SJ, Byun SJ, et al. Twelve-year incidence of retinal vein occlusion and its trend in Korea. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;258:2095-104.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Song MY, Kim Y, Han K, Kim JH. Prevalence and risk factors of age-related macular degeneration in South Korea: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2025;32:34-43.
crossref pmid
8. Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, et al. Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2021;128:1580-91.
crossref pmid
9. Deng Y, Qiao L, Du M, et al. Age-related macular degeneration: epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and targeted therapy. Genes Dis 2022;9:62-79.
crossref pmid
10. Sakini AS, Hamid AK, Alkhuzaie ZA, et al. Diabetic macular edema (DME): dissecting pathogenesis, prognostication, diagnostic modalities along with current and futuristic therapeutic insights. Int J Retina Vitreous 2024;10:83.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Nguyen QD, Das A, Do DV, et al. Brolucizumab: evolution through preclinical and clinical studies and the implications for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2020;127:963-76.
crossref pmid
12. Yen WT, Wu CS, Yang CH, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024;14:2485.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [Internet]. Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, [cited 2025 Jul 21]. Available from: https://mfds.go.kr/eng/
14. Park YM, Son KJ, Chung EJ, Kim SH. Analyzing treatment patterns for neovascular age-related macular degeneration with expansion of the Korean health insurance policy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2023;64:913-22.
crossref pdf
15. Arthur E, Young SB, Elsner AE, et al. Central macular thickness in diabetic patients: a sex-based analysis. Optom Vis Sci 2019;96:266-75.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Kim DW, Kim MS. Ten-year trends of fluorescein angiography in Korea using data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. J Korean Med Sci 2025;40:e39.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. Yoon YS, Yoon WT, Kim JW, et al. Proportion of and reason for bevacizumab usage in the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2021;62:1076-83.
crossref pdf

Fig. 1
Number of patients who underwent intravitreal injection (IVI) from 2014-2023 per 100,000 persons in South Korea.
kjo-2025-0023f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Number of intravitreal injections (IVIs) from 2014-2023 in South Korea.
kjo-2025-0023f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Total medical expenses of intravitreal injection performed from 2014-2023 in South Korea. Medical cost was calculated based on the purchasing power parity (PPP) conversion factor for South Korea corresponding to each respective year.
kjo-2025-0023f3.jpg
Fig. 4
Average number of patients who underwent intravitreal injection (IVI) from 2014-2023 per 100,000 persons by age group.
kjo-2025-0023f4.jpg
Fig. 5
Percentage of intravitreal injections by healthcare facility type.
kjo-2025-0023f5.jpg
Table 1
Number of patients undergoing IVI from 2014 to 2023 in South Korea by sex and age group
Variable Year

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total 26,005 (51.2) 32,443 (63.6) 38,550 (75.3) 41,853 (81.5) 50,762 (98.4) 57,255 (110.6) 67,012 (129.3) 73,584 (142.1) 81,204 (157.2) 92,124 (178.1)
Sex
 Male 14,935 (58.7) 18,921 (74.0) 22,281 (86.8) 24,293 (94.4) 29,466 (114.0) 33,051 (127.4) 38,916 (150.1) 42,718 (165.1) 47,320 (183.3) 53,814 (208.1)
 Female 11,070 (43.8) 13,522 (53.2) 16,269 (63.7) 17,560 (68.5) 21,296 (82.8) 24,204 (93.8) 28,096 (108.4) 30,866 (119.2) 33,884 (131.1) 38,310 (148.2)
Age group
 40-49 yr 1,836 (3.6) 2,138 (4.2) 2,497 (4.9) 2,544 (5.0) 3,025 (5.9) 3,254 (6.3) 3,682 (7.1) 3,736 (7.2) 3,792 (7.3) 3,965 (7.7)
 50-59 yr 4,950 (9.8) 5,866 (11.5) 6,933 (13.5) 7,484 (14.6) 8,875 (17.2) 9,464 (18.3) 10,680 (20.6) 10,994 (21.2) 11,330 (21.9) 12,071 (23.3)
 60-69 yr 7,354 (14.5) 9,196 (18.0) 11,289 (22.0) 12,337 (24.0) 14,812 (28.7) 16,432 (31.7) 19,283 (37.2) 21,572 (41.7) 23,506 (45.5) 26,405 (51.1)
 70-79 yr 8,211 (16.2) 10,687 (20.9) 12,326 (24.1) 13,482 (26.2) 16,453 (31.9) 18,939 (36.6) 22,235 (42.9) 24,321 (47.0) 27,114 (52.5) 30,807 (59.8)
 ≥80 yr 2,743 (5.4) 3,930 (7.7) 4,777 (9.3) 5,562 (10.8) 7,134 (13.8) 8,887 (17.2) 10,968 (21.2) 12,959 (25.0) 16,195 (31.3) 19,882 (38.4)

Values are presented as number of patients undergoing IVI and number of patients undergoing IVI per 100,000 persons.

IVI = intravitreal injection.

Table 2
Number of intravitreal injections from 2014 to 2023 in South Korea by age group
Variable Year

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total 54,026 76,542 90,043 100,021 126,219 152,158 187,251 214,452 240,160 291,784
Sex
 Male 31,938 46,204 53,769 59,331 75,636 90,672 112,048 127,708 143,053 174,794
 Female 22,088 30,338 36,273 40,690 50,583 61,486 75,204 86,745 97,108 116,989
Age group
 40-49 yr 2,802 3,593 4,295 4,635 5,719 6,457 7,989 8,197 7,964 8,389
 50-59 yr 8,778 11,862 13,967 15,560 19,139 20,854 24,707 26,263 26,852 29,279
 60-69 yr 15,276 21,454 26,212 29,021 35,986 42,121 51,229 59,662 64,944 77,765
 70-79 yr 18,775 27,358 30,819 33,920 43,375 53,759 66,525 75,413 84,910 102,955
 ≥80 yr 6,539 10,287 12,310 14,347 18,811 25,537 32,774 40,699 51,606 69,138
Table 3
Total medical costs for intravitreal injection from 2014 to 2023 in South Korea
Year

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total medical cost
 In 1,000 KRW 4,726,449 6,917,834 8,285,375 9,547,039 12,991,656 16,590,637 21,364,958 25,108,913 28,728,869 35,621,678
 In PPP dollars 5,426,462 8,072,151 9,656,614 10,948,439 15,212,711 19,587,528 25,771,963 30,288,194 35,206,947 44,507,625

PPP calculated using the PPP conversion factor for South Korea corresponding to each respective year.

PPP = purchasing power parity.



ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#1001, Jeokseon Hyundai BD
130, Sajik-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03170, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2266-7397    Fax: +82-2-2277-5194    E-mail: kos@ijpnc.com                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next