Clinical Characteristics and Visual Outcomes of Cat Scratch Disease

Article information

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2025;39(3):205-212
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 April 16
doi : https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2024.0129
Department of Ophthalmology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
Corresponding Author: Jane Shi, MBChB. Department of Ophthalmology, Waikato Hospital, 183 Pembroke St, Hamilton 3204, New Zealand. Tel: 64-7-839-8899, Fax: 64-7-839-4918, Email: janeshi00001@gmail.com
Received 2024 October 20; Revised 2025 February 28; Accepted 2025 April 9.

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the clinical presentation, ocular complications, treatment, and visual outcomes in a series of 17 patients from New Zealand with neuroretinitis secondary to Bartonella henselae.

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional single-center study from 2001 to 2024. Data was extracted from a clinical database of all patients treated for B. henselae over the past 23 years. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 26.0.

Results

Seventeen patients (19 eyes) were included with 11 (65%) being female. The mean age at presentation was 28.3 ± 12.3 years (range, 13–60 years). The mean presenting visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study testing) was 50 ± 23 (range, 4–90). The mean final visual acuity was 78 ± 12 (range, 45–90). Eleven patients (65%) had cats or kittens at home, with only one (6%) recounting a history of being scratched. Eight patients (47%) demonstrated the characteristic macular star at presentation, with all eventually developing macular star within a mean of 6 days. Four patients (24%) had macular oedema, three (18%) had vasculitis, two (12%) had uveitis, two (12%) had disc granuloma, and one (6%) had multifocal chorioretinitis. Six patients (35%) were treated with rifampicin and doxycycline, one (6%) with rifampicin and azithromycin, two (12%) with doxycycline only, two (12%) with co-trimoxazole monotherapy, and one patient (6%), who was breast-feeding, was treated with erythromycin. Four patients (24%) did not have receive any treatment.

Conclusions

The characteristic macular star is not always manifest at initial presentation for patients with neuroretinitis secondary to B. henselae, nor is there always a preceding history of cat exposure. Not all patients require treatment to have a good visual outcome, and the immune status of the patient is important.

Neuroretinitis is a primary inflammatory process of the optic disc and its vasculature, resulting in leakage of proteinaceous material into the outer retina of the macula in a stellate or star configuration (Fig. 1). Cat scratch disease (CSD) is due to Bartonella henselae infection and is the most common cause of neuroretinitis, which is typically but not always preceded by the scratch of an infected cat [1]. CSD is usually a self-limited process [2]. Most individuals typically present with lymphadenopathy, although concurrent systemic signs such as fever, sore throat, skin changes, muscle aches and pain, and visual symptoms are reported in up to 70% of patients [3]. Ten percent of patients with B. henselae infection manifest ocular symptomatology that usually follows a benign course in the immunocompetent host [4]. Parinaud oculoglandular syndrome is a clinical entity comprising of follicular conjunctivitis and systemic lymphadenopathy and occurs in up to 5% of symptomatic patients [2]. Aside from neuroretinitis, other posterior segment findings include intermediate/posterior uveitis, focal retinochoroiditis, macular oedema (Fig. 2), branch retinal artery and vein occlusions, choroiditis, vasculitis and angiomatous vasoproliferative lesions, usually with immunocompromised patients displaying the latter [2].

Fig. 1

The macular star, a result of proteinaceous leakage from the optic disc vasculature into the outer retina of the macular in a stellate configuration.

Fig. 2

Optical coherence tomography image of subretinal fluid accumulating at the macular, a posterior segment manifestation of neuroretinitis.

This series summaries the ocular manifestations, ocular complications, treatment and visual outcomes in 17 patients with neuroretinitis from a single tertiary center in Waikato, New Zealand.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This study did not require ethical permission because it was an anonymized database analysis, viewed as audit or service evaluations. Informed consent was also waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki.

Study design and setting

This is a retrospective cross-sectional single-center study over the past 23 years (2001–2024). From 2001 to 2024, all patients presenting to acute eye service with signs suggestive of B. henselae, were referred to the retinal team at a tertiary center in New Zealand. A clinical database has been kept of all patients (serologically positive or negative) treated for B. henselae. Data was collected through this database and medical records. Information was collected for all parameters detailed in Tables 1 and 2.

Baseline characteristics with presenting and final visual acuities

Clinical characteristics of 17 patients with ocular manifestations of cat scratch disease

Statistical analysis

Data was entered onto an excel spreadsheet. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 26.0 (IBM Corp). The data did not follow normal distribution curve, and therefore Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess statistical significance. Multilinear regression was used to assess the correlation of parameters to vision, at the end of treatment.

Results

Seventeen patients (19 eyes) were included (Tables 1, 2). Eleven patients (65%) were female. The mean age at presentation was 28.3 ± 12.3 years (range, 13–60 years). Eight patients (47%) identified as European, eight patients (47%) identified as Māori or Pasifika, and one patient (6%) identified as Asian. The mean presenting visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] testing) was 50 ± 23 (range, 4–90). The mean final visual acuity was 78 ± 12 (range, 45–90). Simultaneous bilateral involvement occurred in two patients (12%). The mean duration from presentation to diagnosis was 11.8 days (range, 0–42 days). The mean duration of follow-up was 207 days (range, 7–1,100 days). Eleven patients (65%) had cats or kittens at home, with only one (6%) recounting a history of being scratched. Six patients (35%) presented with general malaise concurrent with ocular symptoms, consisting of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headaches, night sweats, fever, chills, reduced appetite, and a new rash.

All presented with optic disc swelling. Eight patients (47%) demonstrated the characteristic macular star (proteinaceous leakage from disc vasculature arranged in a stellate configuration) in conjunction with optic nerve head swelling at initial presentation. All patients eventually developed the macular star within a mean duration of 6 days from initial presentation. Four patients (24%) had macular oedema, three (18%) had vasculitis, two (12%) had uveitis, two (12%) had disc granuloma, and one (6%) had multifocal chorioretinitis. Five patients (29%) had a relative afferent pupillary defect documented on presentation.

All patients in our cohort had serological workup for infectious and inflammatory etiologies including sarcoid, leptospira, toxoplasma, and syphilis. Nine patients (53%) had neuroimaging to investigate for other causes of optic nerve swelling such as demyelination or compressive lesion. Additionally, 12 (71%) had chest imaging as part of their infective screen. Five (29%) had fundus fluorescein angiogram to assess causes for vasculitis and vascular occlusions. Seven patients (41%) demonstrated both immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM seropositivity for B. henselae, whilst 10 (59%) were seropositive for IgG and seronegative for IgM. Six patients (35%) were treated with rifampicin (300 mg twice daily for 1 month) and doxycycline (100 mg twice daily for 1 month), one patient (6%) with rifampicin and azithromycin (250 mg once daily for 1 month), two patients (12%) with doxycycline only, two (12%) with co-trimoxazole monotherapy (960 mg twice daily for 6 weeks), and one patient (6%), who was breast-feeding, was treated with erythromycin. Four patients (24%) did not have receive any treatment (Table 2).

A mean visual acuity of 74 letters was achieved by the untreated cohort (4 patients), compared to 80 achieved by the treated cohort (12 patients). There was no documented final visual acuity for three in the treated cohort due to nonattendance. The mean presenting visual acuity was 45 letters in those that did not receive treatment, compared to 51 in those that were treated.

A statistically significant difference was observed in posttreatment visual acuity with a final visual acuity of 80 letters (95% confidence interval, 15.8–44.4; p = 0.001). Statistical analysis was not possible for eyes which did not receive treatment due to very small numbers.

Multivariable analysis was performed to ascertain association of signs and their impact on final visual acuity of eyes that were given treatment. No clinical features showed significant association to posttreatment visual acuity except preoperative visual acuity improvement (Table 3).

Multivariate analysis of clinical features to show impact on posttreatment visual acuity

Discussion

This is the largest study of the clinical characteristics, ocular complications, treatment, and visual outcomes of patients with neuroretinitis in New Zealand to date, comprising 19 eyes in 17 patients. The diagnosis of neuroretinitis was made based on clinical presentation, serological results, and clinical progress. All patients presented with optic nerve head swelling and all either presented with or went on to develop the macular star. Despite the absence of cat scratch in all but one patient, the diagnosis of Bartonella neuroretinitis was made as it has been increasingly demonstrated that disease transmission can occur through other arthropod vectors such as ticks, biting flies, and other organisms yet to be identified [1,5,6]. All patients had infectious and inflammatory serological workup for other etiologies of neuroretinitis such as toxoplasma, toxocara [7], leptospirosis, syphilis, and sarcoid.

There is a subset of patients who present with optic disc oedema with macula star where the underlying etiology is a mimicker of neuroretinitis [8]. Conditions that fall into this category include hypertensive retinopathy, papilledema, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, and toxic causes [3,912]. It is unusual for hypertensive retinopathy to present unilaterally [10]. In the 10 patients that did not demonstrate seropositivity to both Bartonella IgG and IgM antibodies, 4 patients had neuroimaging which would have excluded causes of papilledema such as space-occupying lesion or idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy primarily affects those above the age of 50 years [13], and only one patient fit this criteria of the remaining patients demonstrated improvement in visual function by 15 ETDRS letters. Toxic causes of optic disc oedema with macula star include agent such as bis-chloethyl-nitrosurea, procarbazine, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. None of the patients in this cohort reported taking any of these medications.

Four patients (24%) did not receive any systemic treatment, and on average achieved a worse final visual acuity of 74 letters compared to 80 letters in those who were treated. Those that were not treated also had a lower mean visual acuity at presentation of 45 compared to 51 in those who received treatment. Six patients (35%) were treated with both rifampicin and doxycycline, and has been reported in the literature to accelerate visual recovery [14]. The four patients who did not receive treatment were noted to have made clinical progress without treatment prior to Bartonella titers returning. The role of treatment in neuroretinitis remains a disputed area. Solley et al. [15] conducted a retrospective case series on 24 patients with choroidal, retinal, or optic disc manifestations of Bartonella disease and did not observe a difference in final visual acuity between 11 patients who received treatment and 13 patients who were not treated. Chi et al. [16] found no difference in the final visual acuity between treatment with systemic antibiotics including azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, co-trimoxazole, systemic corticosteroids, or combination treatment of both. Conversely, a noncontrolled small study by Reed et al. [14] did suggest efficacy of early antimicrobial treatment with doxycyline and rifampicin. Habot-Wilner et al. [17] found better final visual acuity in those who received combination treatment of antimicrobials (including doxycycline and rifampicin in combination as well as monotherapy, fluoroquinolones or macrolides monotherapy, or in combination with rifampicin) and corticosteroids, although the authors were unable to evaluate whether drug treatment was superior to no treatment. In their literature review of neuroretinitis from CSD, Purvin et al. [3] found treatment to be very heterogenous in the literature where 14 patients received no treatment, 37 patients were treated with antibiotics alone, 10 patients were treated with steroids and antibiotics, and 3 patients treated with steroids alone. The authors noted that based on small case series, combination treatment of doxycycline and rifampicin [14] and ciprofloxacin [18]. Based on the above, no definitive conclusions can be drawn about the efficacy of treatment and remains an area of controversy in the management of neuroretinitis.

Systemic symptoms have been reported to be associated with 50% to 70% of CSD cases [3,16,17,19]. In our study, six patients (35%) reported preceding systemic symptoms consisting of fevers, chills, reduced appetite, headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and new rash, which is lower than that reported in the literature. Only one patient reported a history of being scratched by a cat, whilst 11 patients (65%) had cats or kittens at home. It is known that owning a cat or kitten or being scratched, bitten, or licked by an infected feline is a significant risk factor for CSD; however, up to 25% of people with CSD do not report close contact with cats, though transmission from another infected person has been reported [20].

All patients in our cohort demonstrated IgG seropositivity to B. henselae, whilst seven were also seropositive for IgM. The two main methods of detecting anti-B. henselae antibodies are through indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The former technique was used in this study for both IgG and IgM. IgG remains positive long after infection for up to 2 or more years, hence seropositivity may reflect past as opposed to current infection [21]. This contrasts with IgM, which are reported to be present in the acute phases of disease and decreases with time [22]. By 3 months, only 4% of patients with CSD are seropositive for IgM [23]. Both IFA and ELISA are reported to have low sensitivity in diagnosing CSD [21]. Using IFA, IgG sensitivity is reported to be 36% to 67% and specificity of 82%, and IgM sensitivity of 46% to 53% and specificity of 93% [21,24,25]. Based on these numbers, the probability of a false-negative IgG result in our cohort is up to 64%, and a false-negative IgM result of 54%. Furthermore, serological positivity also depends upon the genotype of B. henselae and also the cross-reactivity to other pathogens such as chlamydia. The genotype I of B. henselae has high rates of serological positivity (38%–75%) as compared to genotype II (7%–67%) [21]. It is therefore important to consider the entire clinical picture when interpreting serological results. In the setting where specialist laboratories are accessible, patients with inconclusive Bartonella serology can undergo polymerase chain reaction testing on a lymph node aspirate [26]. This technique is limited by its high cost as well as potential failure to detect atypical presentations [27]. Furthermore, metagenomics next generation sequencing is a novel technique that is highly sensitive and able to detect multiple pathogenic organisms using a single tissue sample, and has been reported to be able to diagnose B. henselae when standard techniques fail [26,28]. Metagenomics next generation sequencing is limited by its high cost, lack of universal reference standards, and interpretation difficulties.

A hallmark of neuroretinitis, the macular star, the result of accumulation of lipid-rich fluid in Henle nerve fiber layer was noted on initial presentation in eight patients (47%). Habot-Wilner et al. [17] in their large study of ocular manifestations of CSD comprising of 107 eyes from 86 patients reported neuroretinitis at presentation in 64% of their patients, and Chi et al. [16] documented 43% of their cohort of 62 eyes from 53 patients developed a macular star, which is comparable to our study.

This case series is limited by its small sample size and retrospective nature, with incomplete information documented in some patients’ records. A larger study population is required for validation purposes, ideally in the form of a double-blind randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of treatment in CSD as such a study is yet to be found in the literature.

The characteristic macular star is not always manifest at initial presentation for patients with neuroretinitis secondary to B. henselae, nor is there always a preceding history of cat exposure. Common systemic manifestations of neuroretinitis include fevers, chills, reduced appetite, headaches, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and new rash. Common ocular complications of neuroretinitis include macular oedema, vasculitis, uveitis, disc granuloma, and multifocal chorioretinitis. We found that B. henselae does not always yield positive IgM and IgG titers, even on convalescent samples. Not all patients require treatment to have a good visual outcome, and the immune status of the patient is important. Optic disc oedema in the absence of a macular star should not immediately exclude B. henselae infection, because some patients with neuroretinitis may not develop a macular star or develop it later in the disease process.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

References

1. Breitschwerdt EB. Feline bartonellosis and cat scratch disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2008;123:167–71.
2. Kalogeropoulos C, Koumpoulis I, Mentis A, et al. Bartonella and intraocular inflammation: a series of cases and review of literature. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:817–29.
3. Purvin V, Sundaram S, Kawasaki A. Neuroretinitis: review of the literature and new observations. J Neuroophthalmol 2011;31:58–68.
4. Johnson A. Ocular complications of cat scratch disease. Br J Ophthalmol 2020;104:1640–6.
5. Saisongkorh W, Rolain JM, Suputtamongkol Y, Raoult D. Emerging Bartonella in humans and animals in Asia and Australia. J Med Assoc Thai 2009;92:707–31.
6. Breitschwerdt EB, Maggi RG, Chomel BB, Lappin M R. Bartonellosis: an emerging infectious disease of zoonotic importance to animals and human beings. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2010;20:8–30.
7. Choi SK, Byon IS, Kwon HJ, Park SW. Case series of neuroretinitis in Korea. BMC Ophthalmol 2024;24:24.
8. Kahloun R, Khairallah-Ksiaa I, Abroug N, et al. Final diagnosis in patients referred with a diagnosis of neuroretinitis. Neuroophthalmology 2015;39:266–70.
9. Narayan SK, Kaliaperumal S, Srinivasan R. Neuroretinitis, a great mimicker. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2008;11:109–13.
10. Leavitt JA, Pruthi S, Morgenstern BZ. Hypertensive retinopathy mimicking neuroretinitis in a twelve-year-old girl. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;41:477–80.
11. Garcia-Arumi J, Salvador F, Corcostegui B, Mateo C. Neuroretinitis associated with melanocytoma of the optic disk. Retina 1994;14:173–6.
12. Ganatra S, Panchal B, Pathengay A, Sachdeva V. Differentiating occult neuroretinitis and non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy: clinical and optical coherence tomography characteristics. Neuroophthalmology 2023;47:208–17.
13. Hayreh SS. Ischemic optic neuropathy. Prog Retin Eye Res 2009;28:34–62.
14. Reed JB, Scales DK, Wong MT, et al. Bartonella henselae neuroretinitis in cat scratch disease: diagnosis, management, and sequelae. Ophthalmology 1998;105:459–66.
15. Solley WA, Martin DF, Newman NJ, et al. Cat scratch disease: posterior segment manifestations. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1546–53.
16. Chi SL, Stinnett S, Eggenberger E, et al. Clinical characteristics in 53 patients with cat scratch optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology 2012;119:183–7.
17. Habot-Wilner Z, Trivizki O, Goldstein M, et al. Cat-scratch disease: ocular manifestations and treatment outcome. Acta Ophthalmol 2018;96:e524–32..
18. Golnik KC, Marotto ME, Fanous MM, et al. Ophthalmic manifestations of Rochalimaea species. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:145–51.
19. Curi AL, Machado D, Heringer G, et al. Cat-scratch disease: ocular manifestations and visual outcome. Int Ophthalmol 2010;30:553–8.
20. Zangwill KM. Cat scratch disease and other Bartonella infections. Adv Exp Med Biol 2013;764:159–66.
21. Vermeulen MJ, Herremans M, Verbakel H, et al. Serological testing for Bartonella henselae infections in The Netherlands: clinical evaluation of immunofluorescence assay and ELISA. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007;13:627–34.
22. Gulati A, Yalamanchili S, Golnik KC, Lee AG. Cat scratch neuroretinitis: the role of acute and convalescent titers for diagnosis. J Neuroophthalmol 2012;32:243–5.
23. Metzkor-Cotter E, Kletter Y, Avidor B, et al. Long-term serological analysis and clinical follow-up of patients with cat scratch disease. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:1149–54.
24. Herremans M, Bakker J, Vermeulen MJ, et al. Evaluation of an in-house cat scratch disease IgM ELISA to detect Bartonella henselae in a routine laboratory setting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;28:147–52.
25. Bergmans AM, Peeters MF, Schellekens JF, et al. Pitfalls and fallacies of cat scratch disease serology: evaluation of Bartonella henselae-based indirect fluorescence assay and enzyme-linked immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:1931–7.
26. Li M, Yan K, Jia P, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing may assist diagnosis of cat-scratch disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022;12:946849.
27. Sarno M, Rosanio FM, De Brasi D, et al. Systemic catscratch disease: a “troublesome” diagnosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021;40:e117–9.
28. Wang Q, Miao Q, Pan J, et al. The clinical value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the microbiological diagnosis of skin and soft tissue infections. Int J Infect Dis 2020;100:414–20.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

The macular star, a result of proteinaceous leakage from the optic disc vasculature into the outer retina of the macular in a stellate configuration.

Fig. 2

Optical coherence tomography image of subretinal fluid accumulating at the macular, a posterior segment manifestation of neuroretinitis.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics with presenting and final visual acuities

Characteristic Value
No. of patients 17
No. of eyes 19
Age (yr) 28.3 ± 12.3
Female sex 11 (65)
Presenting visual acuity (ETDRS testing) 50 ± 23
Presence of RAPD 5 (29)
Final visual acuity (ETDRS testing) 78 ± 12

Values are presented as number only, mean ± standard deviation, or number (%).

ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; RAPD = relative afferent pupillary defect.

Table 2

Clinical characteristics of 17 patients with ocular manifestations of cat scratch disease

Patient no. Age (yr) Sex Laterality Ethnicity Presenting complaint Cat exposure Systemic symptom Visual acuity (ETDRS testing) Presence of RAPD Clinical sign Serology Investigation Treatment Follow-up duration (day)

At presentation Final
1 28 Female Unilateral European Unilateral visual blurring 2 Kittens at home (no scratch/bite) Concurrent flu symptoms 60 90 None Neuroretinitis IgM negative Bloods, MRI No treatment 112
2* 37 Female Unilateral European Unilateral visual blurring NR NR 85 NR NR Optic nerve swelling IgM negative
IgG 512
Bloods, MRI No treatment NR
3 21 Female Unilateral Māori Unilateral visual blurring New kittens (no scratch/bite) Frontal headaches 35 75 Left RAPD Neuroretinitis IgM negative
IgG 128
Bloods, MRI, CXR Co-trimoxazole 78
4 33 Female Unilateral Māori Unilateral visual blurring NR None 35 NR NR Multifocal chorioretinitis, optic nerve swelling, posterior uveitis, neuroretinitis IgM >20
IgG 512
Bloods, CXR, lumbar puncture Doxycycline and rifampicin 7
5 50 Female Unilateral European Unilateral visual blurring No cat exposure NR 60 75 Left RAPD Optic nerve swelling, macular oedema IgM negative
IgG 2048
Bloods, MRI, CXR No treatment 199
6 13 Male Unilateral Māori Unilateral visual blurring NR NR 55 85 None Disc granuloma, optic nerve swelling, neuroretinitis IgM negative
IgG 128
Bloods, CXR, FFA No treatment 678
7 20 Female Unilateral Māori Unilateral visual blurring New kittens (no scratch/bite) NR 35 NR None Disc granuloma with macular traction IgM negative
IgG 256
Bloods, CXR Doxycycline and rifampicin 14
8 31 Female Bilateral Māori Bilateral visual blurring 2 Cats at home (no scratch/bite) None Right: 55
Left: 90
Right: 75
Left: 90
Right RAPD Optic nerve swelling, macular oedema IgM 40
IgG 512
Bloods, MRI, FFA, CXR Doxycycline and rifampicin 157
9 21 Female Unilateral European Unilateral visual blurring New kitten (no scratch/bite) None 35 60 Right RAPD Neuroretinitis IgM negative
IgG 256
Bloods, CXR Doxycycline 214
10 19 Female Unilateral Asian Unilateral visual blurring 2 Cats at home (no scratch/bite) Concurrent frontal headaches and nausea 55 85 None Optic nerve swelling, neuroretinitis IgM negative
IgG 1024
Bloods Erythromycin 1,100
11 22 Male Unilateral European Unilateral visual blurring NR None 70 85 None Optic nerve swelling IgM 320
IgG >2048
Bloods, MRI, CXR Co-trimoxazole 42
12 20 Male Unilateral European Unilateral visual blurring 1 Cat at home (no scratch/bite) None 35 85 None Optic nerve swelling IgM 160
IgG >2048
Bloods, CXR Doxycycline and rifampicin 161
13 28 Male Unilateral Cook Island Māori Unilateral visual blurring No cat exposure Concurrent headache Nausea, coughing, night sweats 1 mon ago 4 45 NR Neuroretinitis IgM negative
IgG 64
Bloods, CXR No treatment 56
14 60 Female Unilateral European Unilateral visual blurring 1 Cat at home (no scratch/bite) None 55 70 None Optic nerve swelling, neuroretinitis, vasculitis IgM negative
IgG >2048
Bloods, FFA Doxycycline 336
15 29 Female Bilateral European Bilateral visual blurring Cats at home (no scratch/bite) General malaise, fevers, night sweats, chills and reduced appetite for previous 2 mon Right: 80
Left: 65
Right: 90
Left: 85
None Bilateral optic nerve head swelling, vasculitis IgM 640
IgG >2048
Bloods, MRI, FFA, CXR Azithromycin and rifampicin 71
16 35 Male Unilateral Samoan Unilateral visual blurring 3 Cats at home (no scratch/bite) None 10 80 Right RAPD Optic nerve swelling, macular oedema, vasculitis IgM 80
IgG 512
Bloods, MRI, FFA, CXR Doxycycline and rifampicin 55
17 14 Male Unilateral Māori Unilateral visual blurring Cat at home (often gets scratched) Nausea and vomiting for last 2 wk 30 75 None Papillitis, macular oedema, intermediate uveitis, neuroretinitis IgM 40
IgG 2048
Bloods, MRI Doxycycline and rifampicin 29

ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; RAPD = relative afferent pupillary defect; IgM = immunoglobulin M; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; NR = not recorded; IgG = immunoglobulin G; CXR = chest x-ray; FFA = fluorescein angiography.

*

Lost to follow-up after 2002; therefore, there is insufficient clinical documentation on final visual acuity and further treatment following intravenous methylprednisolone.

Table 3

Multivariate analysis of clinical features to show impact on posttreatment visual acuity

Parameter Standardized coefficient β p-value
Presence of neuroretinitis 0.118 0.691
Presence of optic nerve head swelling 0.188 0.502
Uveitis −0.291 0.313
Vasculitis −0.463 0.841
Relative afferent pupillary defect −0.244 0.336
Pretreatment visual acuity 0.851 0.001

R2 = 0.51. No clinical features were shown to have a significant impact on final visual acuity.