Ocular Injuries in Patients with Old Blowout Fractures Following Blunt Trauma

Article information

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2025;39(1):57-63
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 January 09
doi : https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2024.0084
Department of Ophthalmology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
Corresponding Author: Junghoon Kim, MD. Department of Ophthalmology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, 21 Namdong-daero 774 beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon 21565, Korea. Tel: 82-32-460-3364, Fax: 82-32-467-9302, Email: butokay@gmail.com
Received 2024 July 12; Revised 2024 December 21; Accepted 2024 December 30.

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the frequency and clinical characteristics of ocular injuries in patients with prior blowout fractures who experience new blunt trauma, and to assess whether old orbital fractures provide a protective effect against subsequent ocular trauma.

Methods

The medical records of 1,315 ocular trauma patients were reviewed. A total of 927 patients who had orbital or facial computed tomography scans and ophthalmologist evaluations were considered. After applying exclusion criteria, 568 patients with 581 affected eyes were included in the final analysis. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of old blowout fractures, identified on computed tomography scan. The clinical characteristics and the frequency of ocular injuries were compared between the two groups. The risk of ocular injury according to the presence of old blowout fracture ware studied using multiple logistic regression after controlling age and sex.

Results

Among the 581 eyes examined, 140 (24.1%) had old blowout fractures. The incidence of intraocular complications was significantly higher in the no orbital fracture group compared to the old blowout fracture group (20.4% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001). Specifically, the incidence of complications such as gross hyphema (p = 0.001), globe rupture (p = 0.006), and vitreous hemorrhage (p = 0.027) was significantly greater in the group without old blowout fractures than in those with them. Multiple logistic regression showed that the presence of old blowout fractures was significantly associated with reduced risk of ocular injury (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The patients with old blowout fractures had a lower risk of ocular injuries following subsequent blunt trauma. The findings suggest that old fractures may provide protective effect. These results may have important implications for the clinical management of patients at risk of recurrent orbital trauma.

Pure blowout fractures are those in which the fracture occurs only in the thin orbital floor or medial wall, leaving the orbital rim intact, and are not accompanied by complex fractures involving additional structures such as the zygomatic or maxillary bones [1]. Two main theories have been proposed regarding the mechanism of blowout fracture [2]. The first is the buckling effect, where a direct impact to the relatively thick bones of the orbital rim transmits force to the thinner orbital bones, causing a fracture. The second is the hydraulic theory, which suggests that an increase in intraorbital pressure due to a sudden increase in volume causes the weaker orbital bones to fracture outward. These theories account for the fracture susceptibility of the medial and inferior walls due to their thin structure.

Several studies have suggested that orbital fractures might have a protective effect against more severe ocular injuries [36]. The indications for surgical treatment of blowout fractures are primarily based on the improvement of double vision and enophthalmos [7,8]. However, it remains unclear in cases where there are no severe complications, as previously mentioned. If there is a no severe complication with patient who are exposed to a possibility of recurrent trauma, such as athletes, police officers, and military personnel at high risk for repetitive trauma [9,10], making decisions about surgical treatment becomes more complicated. To clarify this, it is important to determine whether there is a protective effect of previous orbital fracture when new trauma occurs. To the best of our knowledge, most previous studies have focused on the effects of a single trauma where blowout fractures occurred concurrently (i.e., in an acute setting).

Therefore, this study aims to investigate the frequency of ocular injuries when new blunt trauma occurs in the presence of old orbital fractures.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Gachon University Gil Medical Center (No. GBIRB2024-164). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study participants

From July 2018 to June 2023, a retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 1,315 adults aged 19 years and older who presented with ocular trauma to the emergency department at Gachon University Gil Medical Center (Incheon, Korea). Among these patients, 927 patients who underwent orbital or facial computed tomography (CT) scans and examined by ophthalmologists were included. We excluded patients based on the following criteria: (1) orbital trauma caused by sharp objects; (2) acute orbital or facial fractures; and (3) those with old blowout fractures who had surgical treatment. Due to these exclusion criteria, a total of 359 individuals were excluded, leaving 568 patients with 581 affected eyes for the final analysis (Fig. 1). Then, the patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of old blowout fractures: 134 (140 eyes) with blowout fractures and 434 (441 eyes) without.

Fig. 1

Study flowchart. ED = emergency department; CT = computed tomography.

Assessment of ocular trauma and complications

The study investigated demographic variables (sex and age), causes of blunt orbital trauma, and significant ocular complications in each group. The presence of old and new orbital fractures was assessed by a radiologist and two experienced ophthalmologists who reviewed the CT scans independently. In cases where there was ambiguity, the final diagnosis was reached through a consensus decision. An old blowout fracture was defined as a previous fracture of the orbital medial or inferior wall that had not been surgically treated, identified on CT scans by smoothening of the orbital contour or joining of bony edges (Fig. 2A–2D) [1114]. The significant ocular complications included hypotony, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), gross hyphema, dislocation of the lens or intraocular lens, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhage, retinal detachment, retinal tear, globe rupture, and traumatic optic neuropathy. The diagnosis of ocular injuries was based on initial visual acuity, IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry, slit-lamp examination, fundoscopy, and ophthalmic ultrasonography. Hypotony was defined as IOP ≤6 mmHg, and elevated IOP as >21 mmHg, with a difference >3 mmHg between the injured and uninjured eyes. Gross hyphema was defined as visible blood in the anterior chamber of the eye (grade I or higher). Lens or intraocular lens dislocation was diagnosed if there was evidence of abnormal position or phacodonesis on slit-lamp examination. Traumatic vitreous or retinal hemorrhage was diagnosed in the presence of significant posterior segment hemorrhage, excluding cases suspected to be due to underlying conditions such as diabetes or hypertension. Globe rupture was defined by full-thickness scleral or corneal laceration. Traumatic optic neuropathy was diagnosed based on visual acuity, visual field, color vision deficits, afferent pupillary defect, and findings on fundus examination.

Fig. 2

Computed tomography images showing bony contour, which is smoothening of bony contour in left medial wall blowout fracture from (A) coronal and (B) axial view; joining of bony edges in a right orbital floor blowout fracture from (C) coronal and (D) sagittal view. The arrows represent the changes in bony contour.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using jamovi ver. 2.3.28 (The jamovi project). Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for group comparisons. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate odds ratios, controlling age and sex, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Among the 568 patients, 392 (69.0%) were male, and the mean age of the patients was 50.7 ± 19.1 years. Among these patients, 277 had damage to the right eye, 278 had damage to the left eye, and 13 had damage to both eyes.

Out of 581 eyes from 568 patients, old blowout fractures were identified in 140 eyes (24.1%) from 134 patients, with a mean age of 56.7 ± 16.3 years. Among the 134 patients, 108 (80.6%) were from male patients. In contrast, the group without old blowout fractures included 441 eyes (75.9%) from 434 patients, with a mean age of 48.6 ± 19.6 years, of which 284 (65.4%) were male. Both the mean age and the proportion of male patients were significantly higher in the group with old blowout fractures compared to the group without (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively) (Table 1).

Comparison of characteristics of patients between the groups with and without old blowout fractures

Severe ocular complications were observed in 93 eyes, accounting for a total of 114 incidents (16% of all eyes). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in the group without prior orbital fractures compared to the group with old blowout fractures (20.4% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001). The most common complications were gross hyphema (4.5%), globe rupture (3.4%), and traumatic optic neuropathy (3.1%). The incidence of all of which was significantly lower in the group with old blowout fractures compared to the group without old fractures (gross hyphema, p = 0.001; globe rupture, p = 0.006; vitreous hemorrhage, p = 0.027). Other complications, such as traumatic optic neuropathy, lens or intraocular lens dislocation, retinal hemorrhage, retinal tear, high IOP, hypotony, and retinal detachment did not show significant differences between the two groups (Table 2).

Frequency of significant ocular complications between the groups with and without old blowout fractures (n = 581)

In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of old blowout fractures was associated with a significantly lower incidence of ocular complications, with an odds ratio of 0.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.02–0.19; p < 0.001).

Among the causes of blunt eye trauma, assault was the most common (34.8%), followed by falls (24.1%) and traffic accidents (15.3%). The proportion of sports injuries, slip, and injuries from flying objects was significantly higher in the group with intraocular complications compared to the group without complications (sports injury, p = 0.025; slip, p = 0.012; flying object, p < 0.001). Conversely, assault was significantly more common in the group without complication (p < 0.001) (Table 3).

Comparison of causes of injuries between intraocular complications group and no complication group (n = 581)

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the effect of old blowout fractures on the occurrence of ocular injuries following new blunt trauma. The major finding was that patients with old blowout fractures had a significantly lower risk of ocular complications compared to those without old blowout fractures. In addition, the causes of trauma were different between two groups with and without intraocular complications. This suggests that previous orbital fractures may provide a protective effect against subsequent trauma, possibly by altering the biomechanics of the orbital structure.

In our study, orbital blunt trauma was more likely to occur in men (69%) than in women, which is consistent with other previous epidemiology studies [36,15,16]. There were differences in age and sex between the groups with and without old blowout fractures in our study. This could be explained by the fact that older people are more likely to be exposed to repetitive orbital trauma, and the incidence of orbital wall fractures was higher in men than in women, as reported in previous studies [17].

The present study showed that ocular injuries were significantly less frequent in patients with old blowout fractures compared with patients without blowout fractures after blunt orbital trauma. The presence of old blowout fractures was significantly associated with lower risk of any complications. Our study is in line with previous studies. Noh et al. [4] suggest that orbital fracture may play a protective role against ocular injury by providing a decompressive effect on the orbital tissues. Several studies have also suggested that orbital fracture during blunt ocular trauma has a protective effect [5,15,16,18]. However, most previous studies focused on the association between new-onset orbital fractures and complications. There has been a lack of studies investigating whether preexisting old blowout fractures provide protection when new trauma occurs. Therefore, we suggest that not only new-onset orbital fractures, as studied in previous studies, but also preexisting old blowout fractures may offer protective effect during subsequent trauma events.

The protective effect of old blowout fractures can be explained by the crumple zone effect. This concept, introduced by Barenyi [19], engineer of the Mercedes-Benz W111 in the 1950s for car safety, refers to areas designed to deform and absorb kinetic energy during impact. A similar idea was proposed by Le Fort in 1901 for facial trauma, suggesting that sinus structures absorb impact forces to protect surrounding tissues [20]. Kellman and Schmidt [21] further supported this through cadaver studies, showing that sinuses help disperse energy in orbital fractures, reducing the likelihood of globe rupture. Our study suggests that preexisting old blowout fractures may provide a crumple zone effect. When subsequent trauma recurs, after the initial impact from trauma, the eyeball encounters a second impact against the bony structures, followed by a third within the globe. The presence of a bony defect and reactive fibrous callus tissue formed from old blowout fracture might extend the work distance and reduce peak force, offering protection during this process. However, this protective effect might not be seen in patients with old blowout fractures who undergo surgery using nondeformable orbital implants. We did not compare complication risks between patients with old blowout fractures who had surgery and those who did not. Further research is needed.

Our study revealed that the incidence of gross hyphema, globe rupture, and vitreous hemorrhage was significantly lower in the group with old blowout fractures compared to the group without such fractures. This difference may be attributed to the protective effect of orbital remodeling, which potentially functions as a crumple zone by mitigating peak forces during trauma. In contrast, complications such as retinal detachment and elevated IOP showed no significant differences between the groups. These outcomes are likely influenced by multifactorial mechanisms, including anatomical vulnerability and systemic conditions, rather than the reduction in peak force. Further research is required to elucidate the specific mechanisms underlying these findings.

In our study, the causes of trauma in ocular injuries with complication were significantly differed from those in ocular injuries without complications. The group with orbital complication was more frequently associated with flying objects, slips, or sports-related blunt eye injuries, and less commonly linked to traffic accidents and falls compared to the group without any complication. This is in line with previous study, even minor impacts might cause significant damage to a small-mass object like the eye [18]. These findings imply that the mechanism of impact transmission is a crucial factor in the occurrence of traumatic complications affecting the eyeball.

This study has several limitations. First, this study only included patients without new-onset blowout fractures. While we classified old and new fractures using CT scans, we found it challenging to differentiate between cases where a new fracture occurred on top of a previous one and cases of entirely new-onset. As a result, we chose not to include acute blowout fracture cases where identifying the very first occurrence of the fracture was difficult. Further research is needed to elucidate this. Second, our study found that the proportion of men with a history of old blowout fractures was significantly higher than in women, and these patients were significantly older than those without such injury. These differences in the patient group can be explained by the experience of at least two or more ocular traumas in patients with present injury and a history of orbital fracture. Additionally, among the complications that can arise following ocular trauma, some are influenced by cumulative effects. Patients with a history of orbital fractures may be more vulnerable to these types of complications. However, this aspect was not investigated in this study. Furthermore, the time elapsed between the trauma and the initial ophthalmologic examination, along with the variable follow-up periods, may have introduced bias in assessing the incidence of ocular injuries.

Despite these limitations, this study provides a theoretical foundation for the protective role of blowout fractures and suggests practical approaches for managing patients who experience repeated orbital trauma.

Acknowledgements

None.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest:

None.

Funding:

None.

References

1. Ahmad F, Kirkpatrick NA, Lyne J, et al. Buckling and hydraulic mechanisms in orbital blowout fractures: fact or fiction? J Craniofac Surg 2006;17:438–41.
2. Waterhouse N, Lyne J, Urdang M, Garey L. An investigation into the mechanism of orbital blowout fractures. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:607–12.
3. Mellema PA, Dewan MA, Lee MS, et al. Incidence of ocular injury in visually asymptomatic orbital fractures. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;25:306–8.
4. Noh H, Chung JK, Woo KI, Kim YD. Occurrence of ocular injury and orbital fracture in orbital blunt trauma patients at tertiary care center emergency room. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021;259:165–71.
5. Kreidl KO, Kim DY, Mansour SE. Prevalence of significant intraocular sequelae in blunt orbital trauma. Am J Emerg Med 2003;21:525–8.
6. He D, Blomquist PH, Ellis E 3rd. Association between ocular injuries and internal orbital fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:713–20.
7. Matteini C, Renzi G, Becelli R, et al. Surgical timing in orbital fracture treatment: experience with 108 consecutive cases. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:145–50.
8. Ozturker C, Sari Y, Ozbilen KT, et al. Surgical repair of orbital blow-out fractures: outcomes and complications. Beyoglu Eye J 2022;7:199–206.
9. Napier SM, Baker RS, Sanford DG, Easterbrook M. Eye injuries in athletics and recreation. Surv Ophthalmol 1996;41:229–44.
10. Blanch RJ, Scott RA. Military ocular injury: presentation, assessment and management. J R Army Med Corps 2009;155:279–84.
11. Valencia MR, Miyazaki H, Ito M, et al. Radiological findings of orbital blowout fractures: a review. Orbit 2021;40:98–109.
12. Kubal WS. Imaging of orbital trauma. Radiographics 2008;28:1729–39.
13. Hwang K, Hwang PJ, Huan F, Kang YH. Degree of swelling of the medial rectus muscle on CT images to differentiate old from new medial orbital wall fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:1174–5.
14. Wu X, Jiang Y. Old fracture. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2015;53:460–3.
15. Lee JS, Lee H, Shin H, et al. Significant intraocular sequelae in orbital blunt trauma and their association with blowout fracture. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2012;53:613–7.
16. Lim JW, Yoo JH, Nam KY, et al. Analysis of ocular complications and blowout fracture in orbital blunt trauma. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2016;57:1282–6.
17. Jung EH, Lee MJ, Cho BJ. The incidence and risk factors of medial and inferior orbital wall fractures in Korea: a nationwide cohort study. J Clin Med 2022;11:2306.
18. Lee TS, Kellman R, Darling A. Crumple zone effect of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses on posterior cranial fossa. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2241–6.
19. Barenyi B. Daimler-Benz AG. Motor vehicle, in particular for the conveyance of persons. German patent DRP No 854 157. 1951. Jan. 23.
20. Cai SS, Mossop C, Diaconu SC, et al. The “Crumple Zone” hypothesis: association of frontal sinus volume and cerebral injury after craniofacial trauma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:1094–8.
21. Kellman RM, Schmidt C. The paranasal sinuses as a protective crumple zone for the orbit. Laryngoscope 2009;119:1682–90.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Study flowchart. ED = emergency department; CT = computed tomography.

Fig. 2

Computed tomography images showing bony contour, which is smoothening of bony contour in left medial wall blowout fracture from (A) coronal and (B) axial view; joining of bony edges in a right orbital floor blowout fracture from (C) coronal and (D) sagittal view. The arrows represent the changes in bony contour.

Table 1

Comparison of characteristics of patients between the groups with and without old blowout fractures

Characteristic Total (n = 568) Old blowout fracture p-value

With (n = 134) Without (n = 434)
No. of eyes 581 140 441
Age (yr) 50.7 ± 19.1 56.7 ± 16.3 48.8 ± 19.6 <0.001*
Sex 0.001*
 Male 392 (69.0) 108 (80.6) 284 (65.4)
 Female 176 (31.0) 26 (19.4) 150 (34.6)
Laterality 0.254
 Right 290 (49.9) 64 (45.7) 226 (51.2)
 Left 291 (50.1) 76 (54.3) 215 (48.8)

Values are presented as number only, mean ± standard deviation, or number (%).

*

Statistically significant(p < 0.05);

Mann-Whitney U-test;

Pearson chi-square test.

Table 2

Frequency of significant ocular complications between the groups with and without old blowout fractures (n = 581)

Significant ocular complication Old blowout fracture p-value*

With (n = 140) Without (n = 441)
No. of complicated eyes 3 (2.1) 90 (20.4) <0.001§
Total 4 (2.9) 112 (25.4)
 Gross hyphema 0 (0) 26 (5.9) 0.001
 Globe rupture 0 (0) 20 (4.5) 0.006
 Traumatic optic neuropathy 1 (0.7) 17 (3.9) 0.089
 Vitreous hemorrhage 0 (0) 14 (3.2) 0.027
 Retinal detachment 0 (0) 2 (0.5) >0.999
 Lens (or intraocular lens) dislocation 0 (0) 10 (2.3) 0.128
 Retinal hemorrhage 2 (1.4) 8 (1.8) >0.999
 Retinal tear 0 (0) 6 (1.4) 0.344
 High intraocular pressure 1 (0.7) 4 (0.9) >0.999
 Hypotony 0 (0) 3 (0.7) >0.999
 Retinal detachment 0 (0) 2 (0.5) >0.999

Values are presented as number of eyes (%).

*

Fisher exact test;

Eyes which have one or more ocular complications;

Statistically significant (p < 0.05);

§

Pearson chi-square test result showed a χ2 value of 26.37 with 1 df, and a p-value of <0.001.

Table 3

Comparison of causes of injuries between intraocular complications group and no complication group (n = 581)

Cause of injury Complication p-value

Yes* (n = 93) No (n = 488)
Assault 14 (15.1) 188 (38.5) <0.001§
Falling down 16 (17.2) 124 (25.4) 0.112
Traffic accident 11 (11.8) 78 (16.0) 0.349
Sports injury 14 (15.1) 36 (7.4) 0.025§
Slip down 14 (15.1) 33 (6.8) 0.012§
Flying object 12 (12.9) 16 (3.3) <0.001§
Other 12 (12.9) 13 (2.7) <0.001§

Values are presented as number of eyes (%). Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

*

One or more significant intraocular complications group;

No ocular complication group;

Pearson chi-square test;

§

Statistically significant ( p < 0.05).