Higher Order Aberrations in Patients with Unilateral Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Article information

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024;38(5):375-379
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 August 16
doi : https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2024.0049
1Department of Ophthalmology, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye
2Department of Ophthalmology, World Eye Hospital Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkiye
3Yüksekova State Hospital, Hakkari, Turkiye
Corresponding Author: Melek Mutlu Sönmez, MD. Department of Ophthalmology, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Istanbul 34722, Turkiye. Tel: 90-216-606520, Fax: 90-216-6065210, Email: melekmutlu06@gmail.com
Received 2024 April 9; Revised 2024 July 24; Accepted 2024 August 5.

Abstract

Purpose

To compare corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) in patients with epiphora caused by unilateral primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) and their fellow eyes.

Methods

A total of 122 eyes of 61 patients with unilateral PANDO were included. Affected eyes were named as group 1 and contralateral eyes as group 2. The Munk score and fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT) were assessed. Corneal topographic and HOAs measurements were taken by Sirius topography.

Results

There were 47 female and 14 male patients. The mean keratometry was 43.84 ± 1.4 in group 1 and 43.96 ± 1.4 in group 2 (p = 0.73). The mean corneal topographic astigmatism was 0.81 ± 0.7 in group 1 and 0.78 ± 0.5 in group 2 (p = 0.57). The mean coma-like aberration was 0.19 ± 0.2 in group 1 and 0.10 ± 0.1 in group 2 (p = 0.03). The mean spherical-like aberration was 0.16 ± 0.1 in group 1 and 0.11 ± 0.1 in group 2 (p = 0.04). The mean total corneal HOA was 0.30 ± 0.5 in group 1 and 0.23 ± 0.2 in group 2 (p = 0.04). The mean Munk score was 3.47 ± 1.0 in group 1. There was a positive correlation between the Munk score and both coma-like aberration (r = 0.53, p = 0.003) and total corneal HOAs (r = 0.44, p = 0.010). The mean FDDT grade was 2.60 ± 0.1 in group 1. A positive correlation was observed between the FDDT grade and both coma-like aberration (r = 0.48, p = 0.001) and total corneal HOAs (r = 0.33, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Epiphora in patients with PANDO can affect corneal HOAs. As patients’ symptoms and tear pooling were increased as corneal HOA levels increased.

Epiphora is the main complaint of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). Physical and social negative effects of epiphora have been demonstrated by quality of life (QoL) and vision-related QoL questionnaires [14]. Blurry vision, visual quality change throughout the day, difficulty in reading and driving, and frequent blinking are the vision-related complaints.

Since the tear film is the first refractive component of the eye, both dry eye and epiphora have a strong effect on quality of vision [58]. Although detection of vision is mainly based on visual acuity (VA) tests, more specific tests are needed to document quality of vision. Corneal topography and wavefront measurements, contrast sensitivity testing, and functional VA tests are the methods to detect visual deteriorations.

In our study, we aimed to show the difference of corneal wavefront aberrations in patients with unilateral PANDO with their normal eyes. Additionally, we aimed to assess the relationship between corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) and the severity of epiphora.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Medeniyet University Goztepe City Hospital (No. 0568). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures were performed following the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki for human subjects.

Study design and setting

This prospective study was conducted in the Medeniyet University Goztepe City Hospital (Istanbul, Turkiye) from September 2022 to March 2023. Patients who referred to our oculoplastic clinic with unilateral PANDO were enrolled in the study. Baseline ophthalmologic examinations including anterior and posterior segment and intraocular pressure measurement were done to all of the participants. Corneal keratometric and wavefront measurements were taken by Sirius topography (CSO) from both eyes. The data were analyzed from the central 6 mm in diameter up to the sixth order of Zernike polynomials. Coma-like aberrations, spherical-like aberrations, and total corneal HOAs were noted. Measurements were done by the same physician (FS) after first blinking of the patients.

Nasolacrimal irrigation test was used to diagnose PANDO. Test was done under topical anesthesia with saline irrigation from the canaliculi. Patients with a negative irrigation test unilaterally were enrolled in the study. Affected eyes with PANDO were named as group 1 and contralateral normal eyes as group 2.

The severity of epiphora was assessed by the Munk score. Patients were asked to grade epiphora severity subjectively based on the Munk scale [9]. The scale was graded as follows: 0, no epiphora; 1, occasional epiphora requiring drying or dabbing less than twice daily; 2, epiphora requiring dabbing two to four times daily; 3, epiphora requiring dabbing five to 10 times daily; and 4, epiphora requiring dabbing more than 10 times daily or constant epiphora.

Fluorescein dye disappearance test (FDDT) was done in eyes with PANDO. One drop of 2% fluorescein dye was dropped to affected eye. After 5 minutes remaining fluorescein was graded under cobalt blue filter of slit-lamp. The test was based on the modification of FDDT grading by MacEwen and Young [10]. The FDDT grading was defined by Zappia and Milder [11]: grade 0, no fluorescence in the conjunctival sac; grade 1, thin fluorescein marginal tear strips only; grade 2, between grades 1 and 3; and grade 3, wide and bright fluorescein strip.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed by using IBM SPSS ver. 22.0 (IBM Corp). Descriptive statistics were given as mean ± standard deviation. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test the normal distribution of the variables. In the comparison of the values the paired t-test was used for the normally distributed data, whereas the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for the non-normally distributed data. Pearson and Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between two variables. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The study was composed of 122 eyes of 61 patients. There were 47 female patients (77%) and 14 male patients (23%) in the study group. The mean age was 56.67 ± 5.1 years (range, 32–72 years). Thirty-eight patients had nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the right eye and 23 patients in the left eye. The mean best-corrected VA was 0.94 ± 0.1 in group 1 and 0.95 ± 0.1 in group 2 (p = 0.74). The mean standard error was 0.90 ± 0.9 in group 1 and 0.77 ± 0.7 in group 2 (p = 0.87). The mean keratometry was 43.84 ± 1.4 in group 1 and 43.96 ± 1.4 in group 2 (p = 0.73). The mean corneal topographic astigmatism was 0.81 ± 0.7 in group 1 and 0.78 ± 0.5 in group 2 (p = 0.57). Paired t-test was used in each of the comparisons.

The mean coma-like aberration was 0.19 ± 0.2 in group 1 and 0.10 ± 0.1 in group 2 ( p = 0.03). The mean spherical-like aberration was 0.16 ± 0.1 in group 1 and 0.11 ± 0.1 in group 2 (p = 0.04). The mean total corneal HOAs was 0.30 ± 0.5 in group 1 and 0.23 ± 0.2 in group 2 (p = 0.04) (Table 1). Mann-Whitney U-test was used in each of the comparisons.

Comparison of groups 1 and 2

The mean Munk score was 3.47 ± 1.0 (range, 1–5) in group 1. According to the Spearman correlation analysis there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the Munk score and both coma-like aberration (r = 0.53, p = 0.003) and total corneal HOAs (r = 0.44, p = 0.010). There was a positive statistically nonsignificant correlation between the Munk score and spherical-like aberration (r = 0.17, p = 0.340).

The mean FDDT grade was 2.60 ± 0.1 (range, 2–3) in group 1. According to the Pearson correlation analysis there was a positive correlation between the FDDT grade and both coma-like aberration (r = 0.48, p = 0.001) and total corneal HOAs (r = 0.33, p = 0.001). There was a positive but statistically nonsignificant correlation between the FDDT grade and spherical-like aberration (r = 0.44, p = 0.090) (Table 2).

Correlations between the Munk score, FDDT grade, and corneal aberrations

Discussion

Epiphora caused by PANDO is one of the most common ocular complaints in ophthalmology practice. Patients suffer from visual alterations due to epiphora such as difficulty in driving or reading. Besides of lower order aberrations, HOAs cannot be corrected with the spectacles which have an impact on the image quality [12]. In cases of epiphora, HOAs are likely to be the cause of visual alterations. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the differences of HOAs between the eyes of the each patient. According to our results, even though the VA levels were similar between the eyes of each patient, coma- and spherical-like aberrations, and total corneal HOAs were significantly different. Moreover, keratometry values, corneal astigmatism, and standard error levels were similar between the eyes that may affect the corneal HOAs.

Coma- and spherical-like aberrations are clinically important aberration types from Zernike polynomials. Coma is characterized by double vision which causes the light to be scattered like the tail of the comet in the night. Spherical aberration is characterized by halos, ghost images, altered contrast sensitivity, and starburst in mesopic conditions. These aberrations are directly related with anterior corneal surface and tear film integrity [13].

Blinking times have an effect on sequential corneal HOA measurements [14]. Because of this reason we measured the corneal HOAs once after first blink of the patients. Koh et al. [15] reported that 1 month after the lacrimal passage intubation surgery, functional VA was improved, blink frequency was decreased, corneal aberrations (coma- and spherical-like aberrations and HOAs) were decreased, and tear meniscus dimension was decreased in patients with epiphora. They indicated that lacrimal passage patency provides improvement in visual function and optical quality. The different point of our study was we compared the affected and nonaffected eyes of each patient. Even before the lacrimal surgery, HAOs of the affected eyes were statistically different than fellow eyes in our study.

Tasaki et al. [16] studied the effect of epiphora on contrast sensitivity. They have shown that the area under the log contrast sensitivity function was significantly lower in the eyes with epiphora than that in the normal fellow eyes. They underlined that visual disturbances could be the indication for the lacrimal intubation surgery besides dacryocystitis and conjunctivitis.

In contrast to epiphora, there are many studies about effect of dry eye on corneal aberration and optical quality in the literature [7,1719]. Studies have shown that tear film distortion caused by dry eye result increment in HOAs compared with normal eyes. In addition, the use of lubricating eye drops for dry eye improves visual performance and reduces corneal aberrations [2022]. Based on the literature, tear film instability caused by epiphora or dry eye has influence on visual quality and both could be reversible after treatment.

The FDDT is as important as the irrigation test to evaluate nasolacrimal passage [23]. We have shown that FDDT grades have positive correlation with coma-like aberration and total corneal HOAs. Both Koh et al. [15] and Taniguchi et al. [24] reported decrease in tear meniscus dimension and HOAs after nasolacrimal surgery. To the best of our knowledge, our study was the first study showing correlation between FDDT grades and corneal HOAs. In summary as the tear volume on the eyelid increased the quality of vision was affected.

According to the literature, Munk scores of the patients were decreased after nasolacrimal surgeries [2527]. We assumed that optical quality may correlate with the Munk scores. In our study we demonstrated that coma-like aberration and total corneal HOAs correlate with the Munk scores as well as the FDDT grades. This means that dabbing times of patients may also reflect their visual disturbance.

The limitation of our study was deficiency of tear meniscus height and tear meniscus area measurements by anterior segment optical coherence tomography, as they can be accepted as more objective than the FDDT grades. Another limitation was the sample size of the study. Studies with a larger number of patients are needed.

In conclusion, visual quality in epiphora cases has not yet been entirely researched. We have demonstrated that epiphora causes increase in coma- and spherical-like aberrations and total corneal HOAs and they were positively correlated with FDDT grades and Munk scores in affected eyes. Further studies are needed to understand the effect of epiphora on visual disturbances objectively.

Acknowledgements

None.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Funding

None.

References

1. Kabata Y, Goto S, Takahashi G, Tsuneoka H. Vision-related quality of life in patients undergoing silicone tube intubation for lacrimal passage obstructions. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:147–50.
2. Jutley G, Karim R, Joharatnam N, et al. Patient satisfaction following endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a quality of life study. Eye (Lond) 2013;27:1084–9.
3. Ho A, Sachidananda R, Carrie S, Neoh C. Quality of life assessment after non-laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:399–403.
4. Mistry N, Rockley TJ, Reynolds T, Hopkins C. Development and validation of a symptom questionnaire for recording outcomes in adult lacrimal surgery. Rhinology 2011;49:538–45.
5. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop 2007. Ocul Surf 2007;5:75–92.
6. Koh S, Maeda N, Ikeda C, et al. The effect of ocular surface regularity on contrast sensitivity and straylight in dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:2647–51.
7. Montes-Mico R, Caliz A, Alio JL. Wavefront analysis of higher order aberrations in dry eye patients. J Refract Surg 2004;20:243–7.
8. Denoyer A, Rabut G, Baudouin C. Tear film aberration dynamics and vision-related quality of life in patients with dry eye disease. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1811–8.
9. Munk PL, Lin DT, Morris DC. Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 1990;177:687–90.
10. MacEwen CJ, Young JD. The fluorescein disappearance test (FDT): an evaluation of its use in infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1991;28:302–5.
11. Zappia RJ, Milder B. Lacrimal drainage function. 2. The fluorescein dye disappearance test. Am J Ophthalmol 1972;74:160–2.
12. Karimian F, Feizi S, Doozande A. Higher-order aberrations in myopic eyes. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2010;5:3–9.
13. Kaido M, Matsumoto Y, Shigeno Y, et al. Corneal fluorescein staining correlates with visual function in dry eye patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:9516–22.
14. Koh S, Maeda N. Wavefront sensing and the dynamics of tear film. Cornea 2007;26(9 Suppl 1):S41–5.
15. Koh S, Inoue Y, Ochi S, et al. Quality of vision in eyes with epiphora undergoing lacrimal passage intubation. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;181:71–8.
16. Tasaki K, Hoshi S, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Deterioration of contrast sensitivity in eyes with epiphora due to lacrimal passage obstruction. PLoS One 2020;15:e0233295..
17. Goto E, Yagi Y, Matsumoto Y, Tsubota K. Impaired functional visual acuity of dry eye patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:181–6.
18. Koh S. Irregular astigmatism and higher-order aberrations in eyes with dry eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59:DES36–40.
19. Koh S. Mechanisms of visual disturbance in dry eye. Cornea 2016;35Suppl 1. :S83–8.
20. Lu N, Lin F, Huang Z, et al. Changes of corneal wavefront aberrations in dry eye patients after treatment with artificial lubricant drops. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:1342056.
21. Diaz-Valle D, Arriola-Villalobos P, Garcia-Vidal SE, et al. Effect of lubricating eyedrops on ocular light scattering as a measure of vision quality in patients with dry eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:1192–7.
22. Torkildsen G. The effects of lubricant eye drops on visual function as measured by the Inter-blink interval Visual Acuity Decay test. Clin Ophthalmol 2009;3:501–6.
23. Kashkouli MB, Mirzajani H, Jamshidian-Tehrani M, et al. Reliability of fluorescein dye disappearance test in assessment of adults with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;29:167–9.
24. Taniguchi A, Yunoki T, Oiwake T, Hayashi A. Association between tear meniscus dimensions and higher-order aberrations in patients with surgically treated lacrimal passage obstruction. Int Ophthalmol 2023;43:1135–41.
25. Sipkova Z, Vonica O, Olurin O, et al. Assessment of patient- reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora. Eye (Lond) 2017;31:1664–71.
26. Bleyen I, van den Bosch WA, Bockholts D, et al. Silicone intubation with or without balloon dacryocystoplasty in acquired partial nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:776–80.
27. Lemaitre S, Sarandeses-Diez T, Gonzalez-Candial M. Anatomical and functional outcomes of transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy as a primary procedure. J Fr Ophtalmol 2021;44:404–8.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Comparison of groups 1 and 2

Variable Group 1 (n = 122) Group 2 (n = 122) p-value
Best-corrected visual acuity 0.94 ± 0.1 0.95 ± 0.1 0.74
Standard error 0.90 ± 0.9 0.77 ± 0.7 0.87
Mean keratometry (D) 43.84 ± 1.4 43.96 ± 1.4 0.73
Astigmatism (D) 0.81 ± 0.7 0.78 ± 0.5 0.57
Coma-like aberration (μm) 0.19 ± 0.2 0.10 ± 0.1 0.03*
Spherical-like aberration (μm) 0.16 ± 0.1 0.11 ± 0.1 0.04*
Higher order aberrations (μm) 0.30 ± 0.5 0.23 ±0.2 0.04*

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Group 1, affected eyes with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Group 2, contralateral normal eyes.

D = diopters.

*

Statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Table 2

Correlations between the Munk score, FDDT grade, and corneal aberrations

Variable Value Coma-like aberration Spherical-like aberration Total HOAs



r p-value r p-value r p-value
Munk score 3.47 ± 1.0 (1–5) 0.53 0.003* 0.17 0.340 0.44 0.010*
FDDT grade 2.60 ± 0.1 (2–3) 0.48 0.001* 0.44 0.090 0.33 0.001*

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range).

FDDT = fluorescein dye disappearance test; HOA = higher order aberration.

*

Statistically significant (p < 0.05).