Korean J Ophthalmol > Volume 35(3); 2021 > Article |
|
Study and design | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | Intervention and no. of participants | Tamponade and follow-up periods (mon) | Single operation attachment rate and percentage (treatment vs. control) | Preoperative logMAR BCVA (treatment vs. control) | Final logMAR BCVA (treatment vs. control) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bilgin et al. (2019) [11]; Prospective, randomized, controlled | RRD | Pediatric patients, PVR grade C or worse, giant tear, retinal dialysis, eye trauma and traumatic RRD, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, stiffness of the retina and the need for retinectomy, and a follow-up less than 3 months | 23-gauge PPV with 360 laser retinopexy (n = 25) vs. localized to tears (n = 25). Total n = 50 | Gas (SF6 or C3F8) or 1000cSt silicone oil; 1 and 3 months | 24/25 (96.0%) vs. 21/25 (84.0%) | 1.26 vs. 1.19 | 0.52 vs. 0.77 |
Dirani et al. (2020) [12]; Retrospective cohort | RRD | Combined scleral buckling, previously failed retinal procedures, giant retinal tears, history of trauma, PVR (grade C1 or more), macular diseases, vitreous opacities, and diabetic retinopathy | 23-gauge PPV +/− phacoemulsification. 360° laser retinopexy (n = 65) vs. localized to breaks, holes, lattice (n = 86). Total n = 151 | Gas (SF6 or C3F8); 3 months and beyond |
61/65 (93.8%) vs. 70/86 (81.4%) for 3-month follow-up 61/65 (93.8%) vs. 68/86 (79.1%) for final follow-up |
NA | NA |
Falkner-Radler et al. (2015) [13]; Prospective randomized | Primary RRD; mild and/or moderate PVR (grades A or B) | Previous RD surgery except for prior laser treatment, previous pneumatic retinopexy, non‐primary RD (secondary to severe globe injuries, infection or tumor), severe PVR (PVR grade C) | 20-gauge PPV +/− phacoemulsification with 360 endolaser (n = 30) vs. 20 G PPV +/− phaco with scleral buckle and localized laser to tears (n = 30). Total n = 60 | Gas or silicone oil; 6 months and beyond | 28/30 (93.3%) vs. 28/30 (93.3%) at final follow-up | 0.72 ± 0.48 vs. 0.88 ± 0.41 | 0.31 ± 0.36 vs. 0.47 ± 0.34 |
Iwase et al. (2013) [14]; Retrospective | RRD | Previous ocular surgery, giant tears, retinal dialysis, trauma, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR, grade C or higher), retinal detachment with macular hole (high myopia), or round hole detachment with no associated PVD | 20-gauge phacovitrectomy with 360 laser (n = 108) vs. laser to breaks (n = 270). Total n = 378. | Air or 20% SF6; 12 months | 106/108 (98.1%) vs. 254/270 (94.1%) | 0.63 ± 0.86 vs. 0.59 ± 0.91 | 0.11 ± 0.26 vs. 0.07 ± 0.29 |
Loiudice et al. (2021) [15]; Prospective randomized comparative | RRD | Prior vitreoretinal surgery, RRD caused by giant retinal tears, undetected retinal breaks after either dynamic scleral depression or scrupulous vitreous base dissection, PVR grade C or worse and ocular disorders that could interfere with visual recovery (e.g., age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma) | 23-gauge PPV +/− phacoemulsifica-tion with 360 laser retinopexy (n = 48) vs. laser to breaks or areas of degeneration (n = 45). Total n = 93. | Air; 6 months | 43/48 (89.6%) vs. 39/45 (86.7%) | NA | 0.05 ± 0.03 vs. 0.06 ± 0.05 (p = 0.673) |
Wang et al. (2020) [16]; Retrospective | RRD | Complex retinal detachments, including recurrent detachments, those secondary to trauma, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, sickle cell retinopathy, retinopathy of prematurity, and other retinopathies/vitreoretinopath-ies or those secondary to inflammatory or infectious diseases such as acute retinal necrosis or endophthalmitis, were excluded. Eyes with fewer than three monthsof postoperative follow-up were excluded, as were eyes where the 360-laser variable was not recorded. | 20, 23, 25, or 27-gauge PPV with or without scleral buckle with 360 laser (n = 516) vs. localized laser (n = 1,732). Total n = 2,248 | Air, SF6 or C3F8 gas, or silicone oil; average of 12 ± 6 months | 402/516 (77.9%) vs. 1,334/1,732 (77%) | 1.3 ± 1.1 vs. 1.1 ± 1.1 | 0.56 ± 0.72 vs. 0.43 ± 0.59 |
Macular Hole Formation in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment after Scleral Buckling2014 October;28(5)