Korean J Ophthalmol > Volume 33(3); 2019 > Article
Lee, Kim, Kim, Lee, and Kim: Encapsulated Bleb Excision with Collagen Matrix Implantation Following Failed Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation



To investigate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of encapsulated bleb excision with collagen matrix implantation performed in patients with failed Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation.


Eighteen eyes of 18 patients underwent encapsulated bleb excision and collagen matrix implantation. Patients were divided into two groups by reference to intraocular pressure (IOP) after preoperative ocular massage: group 1, patients who exhibited substantial IOP reductions; and group 2, patients who did not show substantial changes in IOP. Needling was conducted in group 2. The clinical features of the two groups were compared, including IOP changes after ocular massage and needling, AGV status, and surgical outcomes 6 months after surgery.


The mean preoperative IOP among the 18 patients was 30.6 ± 5.7 mmHg. After ocular massage, the IOPs decreased by 22 and 26 mmHg in the two patients in group 1 and the 16 patients in group 2 showed a mean IOP reduction of 1.6 ± 2.2 mmHg (p = 0.013). IOPs decreased after needling in group 2 (range, 6 to 30 mmHg; p < 0.001). Fibrovascular tissue ingrowth into the AGV was observed in the two patients in group 1 and the same ingrowth was observed in 10 of the 16 patients in group 2. Six months after surgery the mean IOP among the 18 patients decreased significantly (19.1 ± 3.2 mmHg, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean postoperative IOP at 6 months between group 1 (14.0 ± 2.8 mmHg) and group 2 (19.8 ± 2.6 mmHg, p = 0.052).


Encapsulated bleb excision with collagen matrix implantation resulted in a significant IOP-lowering effect 6 months after surgery. Fibrovascular ingrowth into the AGV was common but did not seem to be a major cause of AGV implantation failure.

Glaucoma, the most common form of chronically progressive optic neuropathy, is a principal cause of complete blindness [1]. The first choice for treating glaucoma is medication. However, surgical treatment should be considered if the side effects of medication are too severe or if intraocular pressure (IOP) is not controllable with medication. Trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation are conventional surgical options for glaucoma. Traditionally, glaucoma drainage device implantation has been considered when a previous trabeculectomy was unsuccessful, if there was widespread conjunctival scarring due to previous surgery, or if the success rate of trabeculectomy was expected to decrease due to refractory glaucoma, such as uveitis-related glaucoma or neovascular glaucoma [2,3,4,5,6]. However, recent studies have shown that the success rate of glaucoma drainage device implantation is comparable to trabeculectomy, and that the incidence of complications related to surgery is lower for implantation of a glaucoma drainage device [7]. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study [8] reported 5-year postoperative outcomes of 107 patients treated with Baerveldt glaucoma implants (group 1) and 105 patients treated with trabeculectomy (group 2). The mean IOP and the numbers of IOP-lowering eye drops used were the same between the two groups. The failure rates of surgery were 29.8% (group 1) and 46.9% (group 2) (p = 0.002). Glaucoma drainage devices are more commonly implanted because the indications for this treatment are expanding [9,10,11,12].
Glaucoma drainage devices allow outflow of aqueous humor from a tube inserted into the anterior chamber to the subtenon space around the ocular equatorial area. The body connected to the rear outlet of the tube prevents closure of the tube outlet by surrounding tissue and forms a large retention area beneath the bleb, which is helpful in long-term IOP control. The reported surgical success rate after implantation of glaucoma drainage devices is 68% to 87% at 12 to 24 months after surgery, decreasing by approximately 10% every year [4,13,14,15]. If the IOP increases again after surgery, medication, ocular massage, or needling with or without subconjunctival injection of an antimetabolic agent can be performed [16]. If the IOP is not controlled using these treatments, additional secondary glaucoma drainage device implantation, cyclophotocoagulation, or encapsulated bleb revision may be performed [2,3,11,17]. There have been some reports regarding treatment of patients after implantation failure of a glaucoma drainage device, but details on methodology and surgical results of encapsulated bleb revision are limited [17,18].
This study evaluated the surgical effects of encapsulated bleb excision and collagen matrix implantation in glaucoma patients whose IOP was not controlled by conservative treatment after failure of an implanted Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV; New World Medical, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA), and to determine whether there is a relationship between preoperative clinical features and status of the AGV during surgery.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Chungnam National University Hospital (CNUH 2018-07-018) which waived the requirement for informed consent from participants. It was conducted in accordance with all relevant requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients with glaucoma who underwent encapsulated bleb excision and collagen matrix implantation for failed AGV implantation were consecutively enrolled in our glaucoma clinic from August 11, 2014 to January 31, 2018.
Failed AGV implantation was defined as an uncontrolled IOP >20 mmHg after the maximum tolerable medical therapy, and in patients expecting and/or experiencing progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. The previous AGV implantation was performed by one of several glaucoma surgeons, including surgeons at other hospitals. All AGV implantations were in the superotemporal quadrant. All excisions of encapsulated blebs and collagen matrix implantations were performed by a single glaucoma surgeon. During the study period, 18 eyes of 18 patients were included. For patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery, the IOP was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer at the last outpatient treatment (1 day to 2 weeks before surgery), and ocular massage was performed. With eyes closed, gentle digital pressure was applied to the globe for 10 seconds, avoiding the superotemporal quadrant to minimize the risk that the tube would contact the cornea. Immediately after ocular massage, the IOP was measured once more. For patients without a considerable drop in IOP after ocular massage, needling was performed under slit lamp microscopy. After instillation of proparacaine 0.5% (w/v) and povidone iodine 5% (w/v) eyedrops, patients were instructed to look down in the direction of the inferonasal quadrant. A bent 30-G needle with the bevel in the up position was attached to a 1-mL syringe and the subconjunctival space was entered adjacent to the bleb. Once inside, the needle was advanced to penetrate the bleb wall. Aqueous humor outflow immediately expanded the subconjunctival space and we then measured the IOP. Ofloxacin 0.3% (w/v) eyedrops were prescribed prior to surgery.
Surgery was conducted under subtenon's anesthesia. The conjunctiva was incised parallel to and 10 mm apart from the corneal limbus over the body of the AGV (Fig. 1A). The encapsulated bleb observed under the conjunctiva was incised until the AGV body was exposed. To prevent damage to the AGV, the bleb was cut gradually using a No. 15 blade; the blade was turned upside down to use the upward-facing blade to extend the bleb incision when the aqueous humor began to seep out (Fig. 1B, 1C). The size of the bleb excision was sufficient to expose the chamber (7 × 8 mm), which was composed of two elastic sheets (valve leaflets) connected to the tube outlet and the cover over it and extended as far posterior as possible. Then, the chamber of the AGV was checked to confirm for possible fibrovascular tissue ingrowth (Fig. 1D). If present, it was removed by pulling the connected bleb, taking care not to cut the stalk of the fibrovascular tissue (Fig. 1E, 1F). A 10 × 10 × 2-mm collagen matrix (Ologen, model 870051; Aeon Astron Europe BV, Leiden, The Netherlands) was inserted into the bleb excised area (Fig. 1G, 1H), and a few anchoring sutures were placed at the anterior margin of the bleb excision, followed by continuous suturing of the conjunctiva (Fig. 1I). After checking the stability and depth of the anterior chamber, the surgery was completed (Fig. 1J). After surgery, 1% prednisolone acetate and 3 mg/mL ofloxacin were given four times daily. Ofloxacin was used for 4 weeks, and the duration of 1% prednisolone acetate use was adjusted depending on the status of the inflammatory reaction. At 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months after surgery, measurement of the IOP, slit lamp microscopy, and a fundus examination were performed. If postoperative IOP-lowering eye drops were considered necessary (taking into consideration any history of systemic or local adverse reactions to the drug), timolol-dorzolamide fixed-combination, brimonidine, and latanoprost were added in that order.
Statistical analysis was performed using PASW Statistics ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Changes in the IOP before and after ocular massage and changes in the IOP before and after needling were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on their IOP changes after ocular massage: group 1 contained those who exhibited substantial IOP reductions and group 2 contained all other patients. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare IOPs and the numbers of IOP-lowering eye drops used between groups 1 and 2 after surgery. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the changes in IOP, and the number of IOP-lowering eye drops after surgery in each group. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Of the 18 patients, 13 were male, and five were female. Their mean age was 54.6 years, ranging from 22 to 70 years. The period from primary AGV implantation to encapsulated bleb revision averaged 24.1 months, ranging from 2 to 101 months. Three patients had primary open-angle glaucoma, five had neovascular glaucoma, and ten had secondary glaucoma, including steroid-induced glaucoma and glaucoma associated with traumatic hyphema or uveitis. The best-corrected visual acuity before surgery was 0.4 ± 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution and the mean deviation using a Humphrey Field Analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) was −15.7 ± 10.0 dB.
The mean preoperative IOP was 30.6 ± 5.7 mmHg, decreasing to 26.5 ± 7.7 mmHg after ocular massage (mean IOP reduction: 4.1 ± 7.6 mmHg, p = 0.036). Two patients (group 1, ocular massage responders) showed considerable IOP reductions after ocular massage (>19.3 mmHg, mean IOP reduction + two standard deviations) with IOP reductions of 22 and 26 mmHg. In the remaining 16 patients (group 2, ocular massage non-responders), the mean IOP reduction was 1.6 ± 2.2 mmHg (p = 0.013) (Table 1). In group 2, additional needling was performed. The mean IOP decreased by 16.1 ± 5.2 mmHg after needling (p < 0.001) (Table 1).
There was no difference in demographics, including preoperative IOP, number of IOP-lowering eye drops, and duration from primary AGV implantation to encapsulated bleb revision between groups 1 and 2 (all, p > 0.05) (Table 2). Fibrovascular ingrowth into the AGV was observed in 12 of 18 patients during surgery. Fibrovascular ingrowth was observed in both patients in group 1 (Fig. 2A) and in 10 of 16 patients in group 2 (Fig. 2B) (p = 0.529). No fibrovascular ingrowth was observed in six of 16 patients in group 2 (Fig. 2C).
In all 18 patients, postoperative IOP was significantly lower than in the preoperative period at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months after surgery (all, p ≤ 0.001). In both groups, IOP was lower at all postoperative time points than before surgery, but statistical significance was observed only in group 2 (p ≤ 0.001). The IOP of group 1 was lower than that of group 2 at all postoperative time points, but statistical significance was observed only at 2 months after surgery (p = 0.026) (Fig. 3). The number of IOP-lowering eye drops used was lower after surgery than before surgery in all patients until 6 months (all, p ≤ 0.011). In group 2, the number of IOP-lowering eye drops was consistently lower than before surgery until 6 months after surgery (all, p ≤ 0.031). In group 1, there was no use of IOP-lowering eye drops until 6 months after surgery (Fig. 4). Among the 18 patients, no additional surgery for IOP control was required until 6 months after surgery. There were no postoperative complications such as hypotony (<6 mmHg) lasting more than 1 month, choroidal effusion, or other complications. Conjunctival suturing was necessary for one patient for wound dehiscence at 1 week after surgery.


We performed encapsulated bleb excision using biodegradable collagen matrix implantation for failure of AGV implantation in 18 glaucoma patients whose IOP was not controlled despite the maximum tolerable medical therapy. As a result, their IOPs were significantly lowered up to 6 months postoperatively, and critical complications did not occur except for wound dehiscence in one patient. Therefore, encapsulated bleb excision with collagen matrix implantation appears to be an effective surgical treatment for failure after AGV implantation.
The AGV, one of several types of glaucoma drainage devices, is a valved device. One end of a silicone tube is inserted into the anterior chamber and the other end connected to valvular leaflets, which are integral restrictors of aqueous outflow [19,20]. The AGV is therefore less likely to develop early postoperative hypotony, choroidal effusion, and suprachoroidal hemorrhage compared to Baerveldt or Molteno implants, which are nonvalved shunts without outflow restrictors [4,14,20,21]. However, a hypertensive phase with the IOP elevated again at 3 to 6 weeks after surgery is reported to be more common with the AGV (30% to 82%) than with nonvalved shunts, such as the Baerveldt or Molteno implants (20% to 44%) [14,15,21,22,23]. The most common cause of IOP elevation after AGV implantation is the formation of an encapsulated bleb due to excessive fibrosis around the body of the AGV during the wound-healing process [2,3,17,19,24].
To date, there is no consensus regarding treatment after failure of AGV implantation because of limited research [2,11,17,18]. Al-Mosallamy [18] compared bleb excision (12 patients) and reimplantation of the AGV (13 patients). The failure rate of the bleb excision group was 8.3% and that of the AGV reimplantation group was 15.4%; this difference was not significant. Implant-related complications occurred only in the AGV reimplantation group. In one patient, (7.7%) the tube contacted the cornea, and two patients (15.4%) had tube erosion. Shah et al. [17] compared surgical results between shunt revision (12 patients) and additional shunt implantation (21 patients). The mean postoperative IOP of the shunt-revision group was 25.3 mmHg, which was significantly higher than the 17.7 mmHg of the additional-tube-implantation group (p = 0.037). The incidence of corneal edema as a postoperative complication was high in both the shunt-revision group (n = 5, 42%) and the additional-shunt-implantation group (n = 9, 43%) (p = 1.000). Rosentreter et al. [2] reported that 10 × 10 × 2-mm Ologen implants (Ologen ver. 2; Aeron Astron, Taipei, Taiwan), an earlier model of the Ologen used in our study, were inserted after encapsulated bleb excision in 10 out of 19 patients whose IOP was not controlled after implantation of a Baerveldt implant. The remaining nine patients received only bleb excision. Unlike our study, mitomycin C soaking was performed after bleb excision in all 19 patients. The mean follow-up durations were 11.2 and 8.6 months, respectively. At the last follow-up visit after surgery, the mean IOP of the group (17.3 mmHg) with the Ologen insertion was lower than that of the group (19.3 mmHg) without the Ologen insertion, although the difference was not statistically significant. Additional surgery to reduce IOP was not required in the group with the Ologen insertion, but three patients in the group without the Ologen insertion (33.3%) required additional surgery.
In all 18 patients included in the present study, the opening of the tube to the anterior chamber was intact, and ocular massage was performed to eliminate the possibility of temporary occlusion of the posterior part of the tube or valve leaflets. In two of 18 patients (group 1), a single gentle ocular massage induced a sudden drop in the IOP, so surgery was postponed. However, these two patients eventually underwent surgery because the IOP was repeatedly above 30 mmHg at subsequent follow-up visits. In these two patients, thick fibrovascular tissue grew into the chamber containing a valve leaflet of the AGV, which can cause the IOP to rise by preventing the valve to open. During ocular massage, the valve temporarily opened allowing the IOP to drop to normal. However, the fibrovascular tissue remained and was probably responsible for the repeated IOP increases that occurred.
Previous studies have reported fibrovascular ingrowth into AGVs, as observed in 12 of the 18 patients in the present study [19,25,26]. Hill et al. [26] replaced the AGV in five patients who were suspected of having obstructions in the valves, with all five patients having fibrovascular ingrowth. They suggested that during surgery, if the device is held too firmly along the center line, a gap may form due to damage to the plastic rivet that connects the upper cover and the lower plate that covers the valve leaflets, with fibrovascular ingrowth being generated through this gap. Careful manipulation is therefore needed so as not to press on the center of the AGV during surgery. Trigler et al. [25] reported that in six pediatric patients with a mean age of 27.5 months, failed AGVs were removed at 6 to 65 months after implantation; all contained fibrovascular ingrowth. They suggested that the incidence of fibrovascular ingrowth may be higher in children than in adults because of the increased wound-healing response in children. They concluded that fibrovascular ingrowth was the cause of all six surgical failures based on the observation that blebs did not elevate after tube irrigation during surgery. However, failure of bleb elevation by tube irrigation may be induced not only by fibrovascular ingrowth but also by an excessively thick and dense encapsulated bleb [12]. Tube irrigation was not performed in our study, but preoperative ocular massage was performed; the degree of IOP reduction was slight in 16 patients (the IOP reduction after ocular massage was ≤6 mmHg). Needling was performed in these patients. All 16 patients, including 10 with fibrovascular ingrowth, had a smooth flow of aqueous humor from the encapsulated bleb to under the conjunctiva, and there was an additional IOP drop, which ranged from 6 to 30 mmHg. We therefore speculate that fibrovascular ingrowth was not the major cause of IOP elevation after AGV implantation in our patients. If the valve had been completely closed by fibrovascular ingrowth, then the aqueous reservoir would not have formed properly around the AGV. In our cases, even after ocular massage or needling, there was no or little flow of aqueous humor from the bleb and the IOP could not be expected to drop. Therefore, it is probable that the IOP increases in the 16 patients resulted from bleb encapsulation rather than dysfunction of the AGV. Fibrovascular ingrowth was carefully removed in the present study. There were no cases that had a shallow anterior chamber during or after surgery, and there was no persistent hypotony. Thus, removal of fibrovascular ingrowth does not appear to adversely affect the function of the valve.
Ologen was inserted in our study after excision of the encapsulated bleb. Ologen is a collagen matrix that consists of crosslinking of 90% type 1 atelocollagen and 10% glycosaminoglycan, with high biocompatibility and biodegradability, and has been reported to aid in the formation of normal tissue rather than scar tissue after surgery [24,27]. The Ologen (model 870051) used in this study has higher biocompatibility than the previous model because of lower antigenicity [24,28]. Rho et al. [29] recently inserted Ologen together with primary AGV implantation. Compared with the AGV alone, the bleb volume in the AGV with Ologen was higher, and the incidence of the hypertensive phase was lower in the AGV with Ologen (4.5% vs. 47.6%, p = 0.002). In our study, by using Ologen, we expected the IOP to be more effectively controlled. We expected a decreased risk of AGV exposure compared to covering only the conjunctiva over the body of the AGV after bleb excision, and also expected to reduce the recurrence of fibrovascular ingrowth by preventing direct contact of the AGV with the conjunctiva.
In conclusion, encapsulated bleb excision with collagen matrix implantation was a safe and effective surgical technique in patients with failure after AGV implantation, although we could not determine the long-term efficacy of surgical treatment because of the small number of enrolled patients and the short postoperative follow-up period. Fibrovascular ingrowth into an AGV appears to be a common finding, but it is not a major cause of failure of AGV implantation. Valve dysfunction due to fibrovascular ingrowth should be considered as a possible cause of IOP elevation after AGV implantation in patients showing sudden IOP reduction af ter ocular massage but IOP re-elevation.


Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-267.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Rosentreter A, Mellein AC, Konen WW, Dietlein TS. Capsule excision and Ologen implantation for revision after glaucoma drainage device surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248:1319-1324.
crossref pmid
3. Lai JS, Poon AS, Chua JK, et al. Efficacy and safety of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in Chinese eyes with complicated glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:718-721.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Coleman AL, Smyth RJ, Wilson MR, Tam M. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in pediatric patients. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:186-191.
crossref pmid
5. Yang HK, Park KH. Clinical outcomes after Ahmed valve implantation in refractory paediatric glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1427-1435.
crossref pmid
6. Goulet RJ 3rd, Phan AD, Cantor LB, WuDunn D. Efficacy of the Ahmed S2 glaucoma valve compared with the Baerveldt 250-mm2 glaucoma implant. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1141-1147.
crossref pmid
7. Kim MS, Kim KN, Kim CS. Changes in corneal endothelial cell after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and trabeculectomy: 1-year follow-up. Korean J Ophthalmol 2016;30:416-425.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:789-803.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Joshi AB, Parrish RK 2nd, Feuer WF. 2002 Survey of the American Glaucoma Society: practice preferences for glaucoma surgery and antifibrotic use. J Glaucoma 2005;14:172-174.
crossref pmid
10. Desai MA, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American Glaucoma Society in 2008. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42:202-208.
crossref pmid
11. Chen PP, Palmberg PF. Needling revision of glaucoma drainage device filtering blebs. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1004-1010.
crossref pmid
12. Jung KI, Park H, Jung Y, Park CK. Serial changes in the bleb wall after glaucoma drainage implant surgery: characteristics during the hypertensive phase. Acta Ophthalmol 2015;93:e248-e253.
crossref pmid
13. Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Choplin N, et al. Follow-up of the original cohort with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;128:198-204.
crossref pmid
14. Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, et al. Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:27-33.
crossref pmid
15. Ayyala RS, Pieroth L, Vinals AF, et al. Comparison of mitomycin C trabeculectomy, glaucoma drainage device implantation, and laser neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of intractable glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1550-1556.
crossref pmid
16. Quaranta L, Floriani I, Hollander L, et al. Needle revision with 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of Ahmed glaucoma valve filtering blebs: 5-fluoruracil Needling revision can be a useful and safe tool in the management of failing Ahmed glaucoma valve filtering blebs. J Glaucoma 2016;25:e367-e371.
crossref pmid
17. Shah AA, WuDunn D, Cantor LB. Shunt revision versus additional tube shunt implantation after failed tube shunt surgery in ref ractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:455-460.
crossref pmid
18. Al-Mosallamy SM. Decapsulation versus valve reimplantation in cases with an encysted Ahmed valve in refractory glaucoma. Delta J Ophthalmol 2015;16:22-26.
19. Kim JR, Lee JM, Kee CW. Tissue incarceration after Ahmed valve implantation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2012;53:1053-1056.
20. Wilson RP, Cantor L, Katz LJ, et al. Aqueous shunts. Molteno versus Schocket. Ophthalmology 1992;99:672-676.
crossref pmid
21. Siegner SW, Netland PA, Urban RC Jr, et al. Clinical experience with the Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1298-1307.
crossref pmid
22. Hong CH, Arosemena A, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS. Glaucoma drainage devices: a systematic literature review and current controversies. Surv Ophthalmol 2005;50:48-60.
crossref pmid
23. Ishida K, Netland PA. Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation in African American and white patients. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:800-806.
crossref pmid
24. Song M, Lee S, Choe D, et al. Clinical and biological evaluations of biodegradable collagen matrices for glaucoma drainage device implantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:5329-5335.
crossref pmid
25. Trigler L, Proia AD, Freedman SF. Fibrovascular ingrowth as a cause of Ahmed glaucoma valve failure in children. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:388-389.
crossref pmid
26. Hill RA, Pirouzian A, Liaw L. Pathophysiology of and prophylaxis against late Ahmed glaucoma valve occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:608-612.
crossref pmid
27. Hsu WC, Spilker MH, Yannas IV, Rubin PA. Inhibition of conjunctival scarring and contraction by a porous collagen-glycosaminoglycan implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2404-2411.
28. Stenzel KH, Miyata T, Rubin AL. Collagen as a biomaterial. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 1974;3:231-253.
crossref pmid
29. Rho S, Sung Y, Ma KT, et al. Bleb analysis and short-term results of biodegradable collagen matrix-augmented Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: 6-month follow-up. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:5896-5903.
crossref pmid
Fig. 1

Encapsulated bleb excision with collagen matrix implantation. (A) Conjunctival incision 10 mm from the corneal limbus. (B) Encapsulated bleb incision. (C) The encapsulated bleb was carefully dissected. (D) Fibrovascular ingrowth into the Ahmed glaucoma valve chamber was checked. (E) The stalk of the fibrovascular tissue connecting encapsulated bleb was identified. (F) The fibrovascular tissue was removed, taking care not to cut the stalk. (G) Ologen was inserted between the Ahmed glaucoma valve and the conjunctiva. (H) Margins of both Ologen and the bleb excision were well approximated and a few anchoring sutures were performed. (I) Continuous conjunctival suture. (J) The anterior chamber was kept deep at the end of the surgery.

Fig. 2

Microscopic findings of the Ahmed glaucoma valve. (A) Thick fibrovascular ingrowth observed in ocular massage responders. (B) A relatively thin fibrovascular ingrowth observed in ocular massage non-responders. (C) No fibrovascular ingrowth was observed in ocular massage non-responders.

Fig. 3

The postoperative mean intraocular pressure (IOP) of patients. The postoperative time points were 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. Although the IOP was lower in the ocular massage responders than in the ocular massage non-responders at all of the postoperative time points, the p-value of the difference was significant only at postoperative 2 months (*Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.026). The IOPs at all of the postoperative time points were significantly lower than preoperative IOPs in all patients (18 patients) and in ocular massage non-responders (16 patients; all, p ≤ 0.001).

Fig. 4

The numbers of mean intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications of patients. The postoperative time points were at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months. Although the number of IOP-lowering medications used by ocular massage responders was less than that used by ocular massage non-responders at all postoperative time points, there was no significant difference between the two groups at any postoperative time point (Mann-Whitney U-test; all, p > 0.05). The numbers of IOP-lowering medications used postoperatively were significantly lower than preoperatively at all postoperative time points in all patients (18 patients; all, p ≤ 0.011) and in ocular massage non-responders (16 patients; all, p ≤ 0.031).

Table 1

Preoperative IOP changes after ocular massage and needling


Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range).

IOP = intraocular pressure; NA = not available.

*An ocular massage responder was defined as a patient exhibiting an IOP change >19.3 mmHg. The mean IOP change was 4.1 mmHg and the standard deviation was 7.6 mmHg. All other patients were categorized as ocular massage non-responders; Mann-Whitney U-test; Needling was performed in ocular massage non-responders. The changes in IOP after needling were statistically significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p < 0.001).

Table 2

Demographics of ocular massage responders and non-responders


Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number.

IOP = intraocular pressure; AGV = Ahmed glaucoma valve.

*An ocular massage responder was defined as a patient with an IOP change >19.3 mmHg. The mean IOP change was 4.1 mmHg and the standard deviation was 7.6 mmHg. All other patients were categorized as ocular massage non-responders; Fisher's exact test; Linear-by-linear association.

Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2021 by Korean Ophthalmological Society. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next