Korean J Ophthalmol > Volume 29(3); 2015 > Article
Kim, Lee, Heo, Jo, and Kim: Combined Cataract Extraction and Vitrectomy for Macula-sparing Retinal Detachment: Visual Outcomes and Complications



To evaluate the visual outcome of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy for macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.


The results of combined vitrectomy with cataract extraction were retrospectively analyzed in patients with preexisting cataracts and new-onset rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. To qualify, patients must also have had macular sparing in a region 6,000 µm in diameter on optical coherence tomography. The anatomical success rate, visual outcomes, and postoperative complications relating to visual acuity were evaluated.


In 56 patients followed postoperatively for more than 12 months, the initial and final surgical success rate was 96.4% and 100%, respectively. The mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity was 0.05 and decreased to 0.11 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Of the 56 patients, 20 (35.7%) had worse visual acuity postoperatively, compared with preoperatively (0.06 vs. 0.27, p < 0.001); these cases were comprised of six patients with epiretinal membranes, 12 patients with a posterior capsule opacity, and two patients with cystoid macular edema. In the remaining 36 patients, there were no significant differences in visual acuity preoperatively and postoperatively (0.04 vs. 0.03, p = 0.324).


In patients with cataracts who develop macula-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and whose visual prognosis is excellent assuming the retina can be reattached successfully, combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and vitrectomy might be an effective treatment. However, the visual prognosis is significantly affected by postoperative complications such as an epiretinal membranes, posterior capsule opacity, and cystoid macular edema. Therefore, further studies should examine methods to prevent these postoperative complications.

With the introduction of scleral buckling [1], pneumatic retinopexy [2,3], and vitrectomy [4] for treating rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, remarkable advances have been made in recent years [5]. Using these methods, the anatomical success rate in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment exceeds 90% [6,7,8]. In particular, pars plana vitrectomy has undergone several advancements in recent years compared to scleral buckling for the selective treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, although their reported surgical success rates are equivalent [9]. Despite the high rate of anatomical success, the prognosis for visual acuity is relatively poor. Despite a surgical success rate of 97%, the mean postoperative visual acuity was 20/50 according to a recent prospective study [7].
Many factors affect postoperative visual acuity [10]. The most crucial prognostic factors include the preoperative visual acuity [11,12,13], and the presence and duration [14] of macular detachment. When rhegmatogenous retinal detachment involves areas adjacent to the macula larger than a diameter of 6,000 µm, the presence of macular detachment cannot be evaluated precisely using a conventional fundus exam, particularly with shallow retinal detachment. Optical coherence tomography (OCT), a novel imaging diagnostic modality, provides high-resolution cross-sectional images of the macular region, which accurately assess the preoperative presence of macular detachment.
Given this background, the anatomical success rate and visual outcomes were examined following pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in patients with cataracts who had no macular detachment within a 6,000-µm-diameter on preoperative OCT. Complications that affect postoperative visual acuity were also assessed.

Materials and Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who were treated surgically for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the department of ophthalmology of the Chungnam University Hospital between May 2006 and June 2009. Approval by the institutional review board of the Chungnam National University Hospital was obtained for this retrospective study. Patients were enrolled if they had rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and preexisting cataracts with a 6,000-µm-diameter area of macular sparing on preoperative OCT for which they underwent combined pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, and IOL implantation.
Patients whose retinal detachment involved the area of the macula within a 6,000-µm-diameter area were excluded from the analysis, as were patients who underwent concomitant scleral buckling. Also excluded were those having pseudophakia, a history of intraocular surgery or ocular trauma, or patients who were followed for less than 12 months postoperatively.
All of the surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon (KJY) under general or local anesthesia. Following a peritomy, three 20-gauge sclerotomies were created in the pars plana of the ciliary body 4.0 mm from the corneal limbus. Surgery was performed using a vitrectomy machine (Accurus Surgical System; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA). A wide-field visualization system (Mini Quad XL; Volk Optical, Mentor, OH, USA) was used. If there was no posterior vitreous detachment, as verified with intravitreal triamcinolone injection, posterior vitreous detachment was induced using a vitreous cutter, intraocular forceps, and pick. In an attempt to reduce traction on the peripheral retina, posterior vitreous detachment was induced only to the posterior pole, and the rest of the vitreous was removed using a vitreous cutter with a high cutting rate. As much of the peripheral vitreous as possible was removed by performing scleral depression on the area over the entire 360 degrees. Simultaneously, the traction in the area adjacent to the retinal break was removed. Following fluid-air exchange, perfluorocarbon liquid was infused until it filled the area posterior to the retinal break. In a preexisting retinal break, intraocular-subretinal f luid drainage was performed using a backflush tip. Following removal of the perfluorocarbon liquid, intraocular laser retinopexy was done for the areas adjacent to the retinal break. The cataract was extracted concomitantly. Before the vitrectomy, phacoemulsification was carried out through a 2.8-mm clear cornea incision. Following the vitrectomy and fluid-air exchange, posterior chamber IOL implantation was performed. Following air-gas exchange with SF6 or C3F8, the sclerotomy was sutured.
Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), occurrence and treatment of postoperative complications, and time of complication treatment were evaluated through a retrospective analysis of the medical records. Patient's age and sex, intraocular pressure, slit lamp microscopic examination, fundoscopy, and preoperative and postoperative OCT were also reviewed. Based on the comparison of the BCVA preoperatively and postoperatively, patients who had a significant decrease in visual acuity were assigned to group A, and the remaining patients were assigned to group B. The visual acuity was measured using a Snellen chart, and the results were converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. A significant decrease in the visual acuity was defined as when the BCVA decreased postoperatively by more than 0.1 logMAR. In patients who developed complications reducing the postoperative BCVA, the postoperative BCVA was measured immediately before any surgical treatment. In patients who underwent epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal, the visual acuity measured the day before surgery was selected as the postoperative BCVA, and in patients who underwent posterior capsulotomy, the visual acuity measured before the posterior capsulotomy was selected as the postoperative BCVA.
In patients who had no complications or whose complications were not treated surgically, the visual acuity measured 12 months postoperatively was used as the postoperative BCVA. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Of the patients who underwent vitrectomy and cataract surgery for macula sparing retinal detachment, 56 patients were analyzed who were followed for more than 12 months. Their mean age was 55.9 ± 14.2 years and 60.7% were male (Table 1). The grade of nuclear sclerosis or cortical opacity was between 1 and 2 according to the cataract grading system, Lens Opacity Classification III.
The rate of anatomical success of the primary surgery was 96.4% (54 / 56). In two patients who had recurrent retinal detachment, the retinal detachment was localized to a new break and did not involve the macular area. These two patients underwent secondary surgery and neither had further retinal detachment. Accordingly, the final surgical success rate was 100% (56 / 56).
Of the 56 patients, 20 had a significant decrease in visual acuity following the surgery. These patients were classified in group A. The 36 patients who had a decrease in visual acuity of less than 0.1 logMAR or maintained or improved their visual acuity were classified in group B. In group A (n = 20), the mean age was 57.9 ± 8.5 years and 60.0% were male. In group B (n = 36), the mean age was 54.8 ± 14.9 years and 61.1% were male. The mean age and proportion of males did not differ significantly between the two groups ( p = 0.67 and 0.87, respectively). In group A, the causes of decreased visual acuity included six cases of an ERM, 12 cases of a posterior capsule opacity (PCO), and two cases of cystoid macular edema (CME). In these patients, the complications causing the decreased visual acuity were treated after obtaining written, informed consent.
Six patients were diagnosed with an ERM after primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using spectral domain OCT. ERM removal was recommended to four patients who presented with symptoms of metamorphopsia. They underwent ERM removal 4.5 to 6 months following the primary surgery. The vitrectomy was performed by the same surgeon (KJY). After removal of the ERM, the internal limiting membrane was stained with 0.5% indocyanine green (Dianogreen; Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co, Tokyo, Japan) for 20 to 30 seconds in a fluid filled eye while the infusion was stopped. After washing out the indocyanine green, the internal membrane was peeled off using microforceps. Two other patients also presented with more than 2 decimal lines of decreased visual acuity, but they opted out of further surgery and were only observed.
Of the 12 patients with PCO, five underwent neodymium-YAG (Nd-YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy 3 to 7 months after the primary surgery (Table 2). The decision to perform Nd-YAG laser posterior capsulotomy was based on slit-lamp findings with evidence of PCO at the center of the posterior capsule and symptoms of blurred vision with loss of 2 or more decimal lines of visual acuity. However, patients were again just observed if they opted out of further treatment.
Of the two patients with CME, each patient underwent subtenon or intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (Tamceton; Hanall Biopharma, Seoul, Korea) injection 3 to 5 months after the primary surgery. All injections were administered in the supine position as an outpatient procedure. For subtenon injection, 40 mg/1.0 mL of triamcinolone acetonide was given, and for the intravitreal injection, 4 mg/0.1mL of triamcinolone acetonide was given at the superotemporal quadrant of the eye.
In the 56 patients, on average the BCVA decreased from 0.05 ± 0.06 preoperatively to 0.11 ± 0.14 postoperatively (p < 0.001). In group A, the postoperative visual acuity decreased significantly from 0.06 ± 0.07 preoperatively to 0.27 ± 0.09 (p < 0.001). In group B, the postoperative visual acuity improved from 0.04 ± 0.06 preoperatively to 0.03 ± 0.05, but the difference was not significant. The preoperative BCVA did not differ significantly between groups A and B (0.06 ± 0.07 vs. 0.04 ± 0.06; p = 0.64) (Table 3).
In the four patients who underwent ERM removal, the visual acuity improved by a mean of 0.15 ± 0.06 logMAR. In the five patients who underwent posterior capsulotomy, the visual acuity improved by a mean of 0.27 ± 0.06 logMAR. Of the four patients who underwent ERM removal, one recovered visual acuity to the level before surgery for retinal detachment. In the remaining three patients, however, the visual acuity decreased even after removal of the ERM compared to before the primary surgery. In all five patients who underwent posterior capsulotomy, the BCVA recovered to the level before the surgery for retinal detachment (Table 4).


For the past several decades scleral buckling has been the standard surgical treatment for patients with retinal detachment [1]. However, complications of this procedure include migration, exposure, infection of the scleral bucking material, ischemia in the anterior ocular region, changes in the postoperative refractive index, and abnormal ocular movement. There are also some limitations in the clinical usefulness of scleral buckling in cases with proliferative vitreoretinopathy, a posterior retinal break, a giant retinal tear, or medium opacity.
Many studies have reported that vitrectomy has a higher rate of surgical success than scleral buckling [7,9]. Since it avoids the complications following scleral buckling, it has become a standard treatment for various vitreous retinal diseases [15]. Nevertheless, vitrectomy also has complications. The most common is the occurrence or progression of a cataract, particularly when the vitrectomy is performed for phakic eyes [16]. The incidence of cataract progression is as high as 79% following vitrectomy [17,18,19]. There is a higher chance of aggravating a cataract postoperatively, particularly in cases in which the cataract was present before the vitrectomy [17]. Accordingly, in patients with vitreoretinopathy who also have a cataract, vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation is preferentially performed [20,21,22]. In the present study combined surgery was also performed in patients with retinal detachment who had concurrent mild-to-moderate cataracts. As a result, cataracts could be prevented from impairing the postoperative visual acuity.
The presence [6] and duration [14] of macular detachment are key prognostic factors, together with the preoperative visual acuity [11,12,13]. However, the macular status can also be a confounding factor when analyzing visual prognosis because the conventional fundus exam has poor sensitivity for the detection of macular detachment, particularly in cases of shallow retinal detachment. Since patients with macular detachment on preoperative OCT were excluded, it was not possible to rule out the effect of preoperative macular detachment, one of the key factors causing a postoperative decrease in visual acuity. In the present series, the mean preoperative visual acuity was good, ranging from -0.1 to 0.2 logMAR. In patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment enrolled in this study, no comorbid intraocular disease other than cataracts were present. Therefore, it can be inferred that the cataract was resolved following combined surgery, which improved the BCVA. Despite prophylactic cataract removal, the average visual acuity for the entire patient group decreased significantly following surgery. Accordingly, the patients were subdivided into groups based on the postoperative change in visual acuity. In group B, which had no complications (n = 36), the postoperative visual acuity improved due to removal of the concurrent cataract, although the difference was not significant. This might have been both because the initial preoperative visual acuity was good, ranging from -0.1 to 0.2, and because too few patients were enrolled to determine whether the result was statistically significant. Of the 56 patients, 20 (35.7%) had decreased visual acuity postoperatively (group A). In these patients, the postoperative complications associated with decreased visual acuity included ERMs, posterior capsular opacity, and CME.
An ERM is a primary disease, but it may also occur secondarily to various other intraocular diseases or intraocular surgery. It can be asymptomatic, but it may also reduce visual acuity and cause metamorphopsia [23]. There have been many previous reports on the complications of combined cataract extraction and vitrectomy compared to sequential vitrectomy and cataract extraction. However, ERMs have not been associated with cataract extraction [24]. Previous studies have reported an incidence of 6.1% to 20.5% following surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment [25,26]. In the present study, six patients (10.7%) who developed ERM presented with multiple and larger breaks compared to others, which is similar to previous results reporting a high incidence of ERMs in relation to the number and size of the retinal break [25]. Also, ERMs are diagnosed based on findings of spectral domain OCT, which make the diagnosis more precise and accurate and increase the detection rate of ERMs.
A posterior capsular opacity is one of the most common complications following cataract surgery [27]. Compared to cases undergoing cataract surgery only, the incidence of this complication is higher when cataract surgery is performed concomitantly with vitrectomy. Toda et al. [28] reported an incidence of 4.2% in patients undergoing cataract surgery only versus 10.3% when a vitrectomy was performed concomitantly. Wensheng et al. [24] reported that PCO was one of the most common complications following combined surgery and noted it in 21.5% of their cases.
CME may also occur in association with various ocular diseases, intraocular surgery, or intraocular laser treatment with a reported incidence following combined surgery of 8.1% to 9% [21,24]. In the present study an ERM developed in 11% (6 / 56) of cases, a posterior capsular opacity developed in 21% (12 / 56) of cases, and CME developed in 3.6% (2 / 56) of cases following combined surgery. These results concur with previous reports.
In the present series, four patients who underwent ERM removal and five patients who underwent posterior capsulotomy had improved visual acuity. In particular, one of the four patients who underwent ERM removal and all five patients who underwent posterior capsulotomy regained a postoperative visual acuity equal to their preoperative acuity after combined surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In the remaining three ERM patients, however, the visual acuity decreased following removal of the ERM compared to before the primary surgery. With an ERM following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, the visual acuity has been shown previously to improve following removal of the ERM [29-31]. However, when compared with an idiopathic ERM, a poor postoperative prognosis for visual acuity has been reported in ERM following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment [29].
The main advantage of the present study was that only patients with macula-sparing retinal detachment confirmed by preoperative OCT were enrolled. Therefore, the effects of postoperative complications in combined pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, and IOL implantation for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment could be analyzed independently of macular detachment.
This study has some limitations. First, the combined surgery was performed on patients with macular-on retinal detachment who had a cataract. Accordingly, limitations exist in confirming the effects of a single vitrectomy in patients with macula-sparing retinal detachment. To verify this finding, one must evaluate the effects of vitrectomy in patients with pseudophakic retinal detachment in whom the macula is attached. Second, this study had a retrospective design and the data could differ from results that might be obtained with more recent surgical techniques incorporating the use of small gauge (23 to 25 G) needles for vitrectomy [32]. Current small gauge vitrectomy systems provide the retinal surgeons not only a small gauge entry system but also more advanced surgical options such as a high cutting rate, efficient suction, and several surgical modes for more safe and effective surgery than before. Therefore, further studies using a smaller gauge system are needed. Third, due to the limited number of patients with macular-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment who concurrently had a cataract, the number of patients enrolled was relatively small. Further large-scale prospective studies are needed.
In conclusion, in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment whose macular region has not detached, combined vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, and IOL implantation may be an effective treatment method. When postoperative complications such as an ERM, a posterior capsular opacity, or CME occur, the postoperative visual acuity may worsen. Further studies should examine methods for preventing these postoperative complications.


This study was financially supported by research fund of Chungnam National University in 2010.

Conflicts of interest

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


1. Schepens CL, Okamura ID, Brockhurst RJ. The scleral buckling procedures. I. Surgical techniques and management. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1957;58:797-811.
crossref pmid
2. Hilton GF, Grizzard WS. Pneumatic retinopexy: a two-step outpatient operation without conjunctival incision. Ophthalmology 1986;93:626-641.
crossref pmid
3. Norton EW. Intraocular gas in the management of selected retinal detachments. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1973;77:OP85-OP98.
4. Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, Parel JM. Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1971;75:813-820.
5. Barrie T. Debate overview: repair of a primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:790
crossref pmid pmc
6. Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Venkatraman A, Feuer W. Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1734-1742.
crossref pmid
7. Mendrinos E, Dang-Burgener NP, Stangos AN, et al. Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:1063-1070.
crossref pmid
8. Tornambe PE, Hilton GF. Pneumatic retinopexy: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. The Retinal Detachment Study Group. Ophthalmology 1989;96:772-783.
crossref pmid
9. Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2142-2154.
crossref pmid
10. Heimann H, Zou X, Jandeck C, et al. Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 512 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:69-78.
crossref pmid
11. Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A. Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92:611-620.
crossref pmid
12. Burton TC. Preoperative factors influencing anatomic success rates following retinal detachment surgery. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1977;83:OP499-OP505.
13. Kaufman PL. Prognosis of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. 2. Accounting for and predicting final visual acuity in surgically reattached cases. Acta Ophthalmol 1976;54:61-74.
14. Hassan TS, Sarrafizadeh R, Ruby AJ, et al. The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 2002;109:146-152.
crossref pmid
15. D'Amico DJ. Clinical practice: primary retinal detachment. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2346-2354.
crossref pmid
16. D'Amico DJ. Vitreoretinal surgery: principles and applications. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, Principles and practice of ophthalmology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000. p. 2402-2421.
17. De Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG, et al. Nuclear sclerosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;105:160-164.
crossref pmid
18. Hsuan JD, Brown NA, Bron AJ, et al. Posterior subcapsular and nuclear cataract after vitrectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:437-444.
crossref pmid
19. Melberg NS, Thomas MA. Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy in patients younger than 50 years of age. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1466-1471.
crossref pmid
20. Treumer F, Bunse A, Rudolf M, Roider J. Pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: comparison of clinical complications in a combined versus two-step surgical approach. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:808-815.
crossref pmid
21. Lahey JM, Francis RR, Fong DS, et al. Combining phacoemulsification with vitrectomy for treatment of macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:876-878.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Lahey JM, Francis RR, Kearney JJ. Combining phacoemulsification with pars plana vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a series of 223 cases. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1335-1339.
crossref pmid
23. McDonald HR, Johnson RN, Ai E, et al. Macualr epiretinal membranes. In: Ryan SJ, Retina. Vol. 3. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. p. 2531-2546.
24. Wensheng L, Wu R, Wang X, et al. Clinical complications of combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy for eyes with coexisting cataract and vitreoretinal diseases. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009;19:37-45.
crossref pmid
25. Heo MS, Kim HW, Lee JE, et al. The clinical features of macular pucker formation after pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Korean J Ophthalmol 2012;26:355-361.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Kiss CG, Richter-Muksch S, Sacu S, et al. Anatomy and function of the macula after surgery for retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:872-877.
crossref pmid
27. Apple DJ, Solomon KD, Tetz MR, et al. Posterior capsule opacification. Surv Ophthalmol 1992;37:73-116.
crossref pmid
28. Toda J, Kato S, Oshika T, Sugita G. Posterior capsule opacification after combined cataract surgery and vitrectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:104-107.
crossref pmid
29. Sjaarda RN. Macular pucker. In: Ryan SJ, Retina. Vol. 3. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994. p. 2301-2312.
30. Council MD, Shah GK, Lee HC, Sharma S. Visual outcomes and complications of epiretinal membrane removal secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1218-1221.
crossref pmid
31. Sakimoto S, Saito Y, Nakata K, et al. Surgical outcomes of epiretinal membrane removal after successful pars plana vitrectomy for retinal diseases. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2008;52:227-230.
crossref pmid
32. Yanyali A, Celik G, Dincyildiz A, et al. Primary 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int J Ophthalmol 2012;5:226-230.
pmid pmc
Table 1

Patient baseline demographics (n = 56)


Values are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.

BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution ; SE = spherical equivalent; D = diopter; RRD = rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; CMT = central macular thickness; OCT = optical coherence tomography.

Table 2

Cases with postoperative complications after combined surgery


logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; POD = postoperative date; ERM = epiretinal membrane; PCO = posterior capsular opacity; CME = cystoid macular edema.

Table 3

Changes in the BCVA preoperatively and postoperatively


BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.

*Paired t-test; In patients who underwent the surgical treatment, the BCVA measured immediately before surgery was selected for the four patients undergoing epiretinal membrane removal and the five cases of posterior capsulotomy. In the remaining 11 patients, the visual acuity measured 12 months postoperatively was used; The visual acuity measured 12 months postoperatively was used.

Table 4

Visual outcomes after the second procedure for complications of the combined surgery


Values are presented as mean ± SD.

BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; ERM = epiretinal membrane. *The visual acuity measured immediately before removing the ERM or the laser-assisted posterior capsulotomy; The visual acuity measured 12 months after the combined surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

METRICS Graph View
  • 2 Crossref
  • 2 Scopus
  • 2,242 View
  • 10 Download
Related articles

Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next